justin_o_guy2 wrote on 02/11/17 at 07:53:32:Yeah, good post, but the point is, the left only Claim tolerance.
They are DOING what they say they oppose.
And following a proven, historically proven, recipe. It's almost as if the leadership is educated in the arts of social conflict.
Manipulation is a very strong tool.
In a free society, unfettered, it can dominate and dictate.
Look how, through advertising, it frames a product.
They have studied the minds through countless studies, and have found you need to "hook" ones attention, or lets call it consciousness, quickly, to form, and pitch your product.
Lets call that "complex simplicity"
Once seated, you now manipulate it to a point of positive emotions, and thought.
Now fertile, you plant a seed, and the end game, a sell.
You present this in a manner that appears to make these, uh, victims (strong word) think they arrived at their choice(s) on their own accord....
However, if we look deeply we see some mischievous manipulating, like exaggeration, to reach our stated goal, a sell, or customer.
Is it dishonest.....???
Well, it really is up to all to decide, as again, the "ends justifies the means"
How do we reign in such behavior?
Censorship?
Restrict freedom of speech?
Makes sense, if our goal is to protect those who lack the capacity to not fall victim to, "false advertising" and schemes....
But hey, would that not trample on the rights and liberties to engage in free enterprise, or those who have the capacity to decide for themselves?
See, I think when we muddle the role of goverment by extending its responsibilities to assure more protection, we weaken the whole system upon which it was originally intended.
It becomes a juggernaut, by such vastness alone!
A moral compass, based upon an absolute, would be a great tool, but again, you can't force anybody to use it, or you've breached our freewill....
Or like you reference again, being intolerant to enforce, tolerance.