Oldfeller--FSO
Serious Thumper ModSquad
   
Offline

Hobby is now "concentrated neuropany"
Posts: 12686
Fayetteville, NC
Gender:
|
OK, I generally don't bring up new Rossi stuff to you guys on the first wiff, I generally wait until Frank the list owner invariably asks his "clarification questions" that carefully bring out the rest of the information and Frank gets the wordings and translation effects all buffered out of the info flow and then Frank will only report what is clarified and "backed back down to reality".
Rossi has made two attempts to make a direct electricity generating E-Cat version, both attempts were reset after several days of running and restarted after modifying the equipment some more. Rossi would only say "a wiff of electricity" or "fair progress is being made".
So now Rossi and Frank are engaging in a dialog which is intended to set the stage for something perhaps pretty significant --- a big success or a big bust, you get to pick as your guess is as good as mine at this stage of things.
Frank Acland July 18, 2019 at 7:32 PM Dear Andrea,
Interesting that you say a permanently self-sustaining heat-producing E-Cat is very close. Can you help me understand what exactly you mean?
1. Will you need an external power source to start the E-Cat reaction? 2. Will the control system need to be connected to an external power source continuously? 3. Do you need to have access to grid electricity for this?
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Andrea Rossi July 18, 2019 at 8:44 PM Frank Acland: 1- no 2- no 3- no But be careful: ” very close ” does not mean ” done ” ( so far ). Warm Regards, A.R.
Karl Venter sam • 7 hours ago I very much Hope Andrea is this right - no external power to start it - no external to run it? That seems incredible / hard to believe? Hope we wont wait too long for demo? What would the typical size be? electrical output 20 kW would be incredible?>
Buck • 3 days ago Rossi is looking for us to get the implications of his comment on discovering that 90 percent is possible!
WaltC July 15, 2019 at 10:59 PM Dr. Rossi, With respect to the possibility of achieving 90% electricity, 10% heat: I find that possibility so very exciting; I wish you every possible success.
If successful, it would be an amazing, break-through product, useful in just about every industry and in every corner of the world. On top of that, it would be an unparalleled engineering achievement and, I have to believe, a seminal scientific advancement.
Best wishes! (And Wow!)
WaltC
Axil Axil • 4 days ago Victor July 15, 2019 at 6:21 AM Dr Rossi, Can you say which will be the maximum ratio between electricity and heat in case electricity is the main object of demand?
Andrea Rossi July 15, 2019 at 2:44 PM Victor: We should be able to reach 90% electricity, 10% heat if this will be the demand. Still fighting, though. Warm Regards, A.R.
Axil Axil • 3 days ago • edited Uh huh. That’s 225000% electricity, 25000% heat. Or something like that.
Stephen Obvious • 3 days ago • edited We might need to be careful making assumptions along these lines. If it works In this way it could be that if used for electricity the over all Output power drops.
On the other hand if input energy is sourced from the out put then the COP becomes pretty impressive.
I wonder if there is an optimum ratio where the overall out put remains high and the electrical output is also high enough to power the device or higher (hopefully much higher).
If such a device produces electricity from or instead of high energy photons somehow but needs to run hot and generate excess unused waste heat in the process to efficiently generate large amounts of electricity. Perhaps the excess IR heat radiation could be converted to electricity using the nano technology and photovoltaics in the other thread. If that’s 80% efficient at IR wave lengths as claimed then we could potentially have a thermally shielded device with an effective ratio of electricity to heat ratio 98. Even if we can only get high output power with lower ratios it could make the device much more efficient.
Alternatively a strong narrow band IR source could have a whole set of industrial and technical uses especially if it can be made coherent.
Of course these thoughts are just speculative.
Axil Axil • 4 days ago A target of 90 percent is a significant shift from 20 percent three years ago. Considering his apparent success to date, I am optimistic.
Axil Axil Buck • 4 days ago • edited The removal of heat from, the SK is where most of the hardware requirements come from. If Rossi can get the heat production of the SK down to 2.1 kilowatts, then a simple fan can cool the SK. The reason that Rossi wants to produce electrical power only is to reduce the production cost way down. Also, if Rossi is going to build 100 million units, he wants to make sure that the SK is as good as it can possibly be before he gets the robots rolling.
Buck Axil Axil • 4 days ago • edited The consequences of selling 5-10 million 2-3Sigma vs. 5-6Sigma units is vastly different . . . especially, as it becomes dramatically simpler to manufacture . . . and as a product of near universal acceptance/desirability. Manufacturing cost is important. But, far less important than reliability and desirability to the long-term health of the Brand.
Self-charging Electrical Cars and self-powered remote living homes are up on the table, boys and girls. This thread is getting kinda interesting, so I thought you would want to know about it.
Also note the theoretical understanding behind all of this is getting much better. Simpler machines are being designed and tested now because the operational theory is getting much more precise and predictive efforts on designing the equipment are possible now.
A really really BIG success or a disappointingly big bust, you get to pick on this one as your guess is as good as mine at this stage of things.
|