Do you want to dialogue like an adult, or play childish games?

Do you want replies, or just a place to affirm yourself?

raydawg wrote on 11/15/17 at 09:34:24:



I like my affirmation, true.     But there really isn't a debate on the supposed "clinton uranium scandal".

The only thing she's guilty of is stupidity.  To allow her hubby to get paid massively by the russians right around the time of that deal.  That's just plain dumb.

There is no "smoking gun" showing any pay-to-play scheme.

BTW, when did this deal go down?  How much uranium does russia have compared to the US?  Who else was involved in this deal? Where did the uranium go?


Yeah, like I said before - this is what aboutism - nothing more.

Our deal leader sees the walls closing in on him and he points to hillary and says "what about her?"

Sorry, it doesn't work that way tweety.

Oh, and lastly, I wasn't asking for debate in the first place, I was offering education.

You're welcome.

WebsterMark wrote on 11/15/17 at 11:08:04:


Yes, yes it is.  


Oh, and it's also true.

If  someone were so inclined, and I'm not suggesting anyone waste their time doing this, you could go back and look at the history of posts involving our two leftist  friends regarding their amazing skills of Trump predictions.

He'll get crushed early in the primaries, he'll get crushed at the debates, he can never win the nomination, he'll never beat Hilary, the electoral college won't vote for him, the economy will tank shortly after he's in office, he'll resign before he takes the oath, he'll resign after 30 days, 60 days, 90 days....he'll  be impeached and finally, taking top honors, he'll be removed from office using 25th amendment.

At some point in time, wouldn't a person have to be even a little bit right? Somehow demonstrate they have at least a tiny fraction of understanding, some perception of the reality? I'm not asking for the moon here, just some hint that you comprehend the world at large and not CNN sound bites? Come on, throw us a bone. Sew demonstrates this on occasion but our Chicago friend has struck out every at-bat.

Lacking that, why in the world would anyone, other than for entertainment's sake, take anything you say even remotely serious?

hmmm...... still waiting for evidence why I should do anything other than chuckle at our leftist friend's post. Well yours anyway. You are always wrong, always. Give us something, anything.

What, no objective discussion?
I'm shocked

It doesn't even have to be a discussion. Just something objective; something original; something halfway right.

aw.... that's news? That's original? That's evidence I should pay attention to your opinion, your input on events?  Everyone knows those things. You didn't predict that or see it coming or anything.

But you have said Trump would be gone by now. Numerous times. Repeating news isn't a sign of anything other than you can read, cut and paste.....