Trippah wrote on 11/18/17 at 06:55:46:The local native populations (Seneca, Mohawk, etc) used an interesting political strategy - the clans were matrilineal - meaning the gals were the family (clan) heads and ran them. Our Olde English system is of course Patrilineal - the guys were the leaders. In time of War, the Natives would select a war "chief" who would lead the tribe's war effort.
This division actually makes a lot of sense. Women worked together to build their community and meet the needs of shelter and edible foods, as well as the core human goal of having and raising children. The Men went hunting, and as need, fought the wars (usually raiding party size). This allowed each sex to maximize their natural tendencies. SO, the answer is, yes, I think a woman as President would be fine. She would be more attuned to what the families of America need -rather than the presently outrageous "Defense" budget now wasting enormous wealth killing every sand dune in Eurasia which has ruled our budgets most of my 70 years.
Ah, thank you....... I'm not a dumb as I look
As to defense budget, it does provide subsistence, it really is a good example of trickle down economy.
It also shows a reckless disregard of what the product instills upon our thoughts, of a peaceful resolution and co-habitations
Think of it this was......
In a disagreement, a person tells you their intent is for a peaceful resolution to the existing problem between the two of you.....
While revealing a six shooter strapped to their waist.
Tell me, what is your minds natural inclination at this point......
Relaxed and opened, or closed and defensive?
Yeah, a women president might say, lets talk about it after a little romp in bed.....
Man, that has my willingness, undivided attention, instantly
Pages: 
