Lets’ see,
From the above,  ‘news’ site.

“…No one should draw the conclusion that this means anything about General Flynn cooperating against the president,…”

“…“It’s important to remember that General Flynn received his security clearance under the previous administration.”…”

“…Obama, warned Trump’s legal counsel Don McGahn that Flynn was vulnerable to blackmail by Russia…”

“…Flynn was fired by Trump early this year after less than a month working in the White House after it was revealed he misled Vice President Mike Pence…”

“…After losing his job, Flynn registered as a foreign agent in March, revealing his company, Flynn Intel Group Inc., was paid $530,000 during the latter months of the election to lobby the U.S. government on behalf of Turkey….”

“… The Wall Street Journal reported that Mueller’s investigation is examining a scheme Flynn allegedly proposed to kidnap Muslim cleric Fethullah Gülen, an avowed enemy of Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, from the U.S. and return him to Turkey. The plan would have seen Flynn and his son, Michael Flynn Jr., paid $15 million, people with knowledge of the discussions said….”

“…The fact that Flynn’s lawyers aren't sharing information with Trump's lawyers means that they believe it is no longer in Flynn's interest to do so. ….”

To bad, someone has stated:
 “…Its official he flyypped on Trumps ass lol…”

Before they read the entire item,
and,     “ the Rest of the Story”
Or any of the links from that link above,
linking to other, ‘reports’.

Perhaps, “It is unethical for lawyers to work together,
when one client is cooperating with prosecutors,
and another is still under investigation.”
Would have, been a explanation,
 Not: “Flynn just cut deal with the FBI”

As the Lies,  (’er Spin),   suggested.

Thank you Mr President

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454028/donald-trump-accomplishments-tha...

ruckus430 wrote on 11/24/17 at 09:48:11:



+100!!!

Too funny is right! Hopey’s 8 year plan for success was timed perfectly huh?!

Missing a key number there sport, 8.
As in 8 years...

No, Obama's policies were not good for the economy. Obamacare cost jobs, they forced companies into part timers.

It doesn't matter how many different ways you try to spin it. To say the gains from Trump's first year are all due to Obama's policies is a ludicrous statement. I believe the link I posted pointed out the awful growth for Obama's 8 years.

Consumer confidence is up dramatically the past year. Unemployment down, stock market up. All theses things are the result of renewed confidence that government is not anti-business any longer. That's a fact you can't get away from. Obama was seen as someone untrustworthy to business. And it's the economy that allows us to live our lives in the manner we see fit.

But we need a good laugh so go ahead and keep telling yourself it took 8 years for Obama's policies to make a difference and Trump is merely riding on his coattails. While you're at it, convince yourself that 2+2=5.

WebsterMark wrote on 11/28/17 at 13:25:44:


No, I know math, thanks.  However, you may want to study econ 101.