Trippah wrote on 01/26/18 at 18:23:56:The Founding fathers did not want a state sanctioned religion; the Masonic Order required you to believe in God, without specifying which one. I suppose it would allow Catholic (The Holy Roman Church) but at least in practice in my very limited experience, declined to offer membership to Catholics. It might well have been a response to the Knights of Columbus for all I know....
So to be clear, the Founding Fathers wanted people who believe in God and were religious, a philosophical common ground on which to base their political ideology. The Masons also. They (the founding fathers) simply, based on their experience in Europe, did NOT want to get into a formal state religion. ie England's the Church of England, France and the Holy Roman Church. etc
So, it appears they wanted a “god” for a purpose, yes?
Would that be for the benefit of anchoring a belief based on a common moral law, from where they can lay a foundation to their laws?
As a rummy, and having done the 12 steps, and having sponsored others through the program, it is “almost” a absolute given that without surrendering your “will” to something other than yourself, your chances at sobriety are almost nonexistent.
Can some find a life without booze, yes, but they seem to carry a chip on their shoulders.
We call them, dry drunks.
Oh well, I think I am getting too far off topic, perhaps.
Let me ask you then, how do you anchor a society to a common cause?
Don’t you think a common thread is needed to keep all its citizens joined?
Simple “morality” is subjective, depending on who believes they are moral, yes, and how much power they hold...???