justin_o_guy2 wrote on 02/12/18 at 11:51:48:Re: me memo
Reply #15 - Today at 16:53:50 Alert Board Moderator about this Post! Quote justin_o_guy2 wrote on Today at 03:10:13:
or do you just think everyone must just listen to you because you're so great? but weren't you just saying something about critical thinking...
Critical thinking is analysis. Critical thinking is not just accepting the propaganda, like
We are saving the Libyan people by bombing their fine way of life into oblivion.
Your attitude doesn't really make me want to offer you anything.
I've posted links to the sites I find things on.
Nobody has EVER brought anything else in from them.
I'll drop some again, maybe you can be less nasty to me.
Critical thinking
Critical thinking is the objective analysis of facts to form a judgment. The subject is complex, and there are several different definitions which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis or evaluation of factual evidence.
dude, you spout off the most conservative of conservative propaganda, you seem to just accept it without questioning it.
and talk about attitude, you've often responded with absolute disdain when people question you or just have different beliefs, you think they are out to destroy America, libtards, have mental problems, must have a deficiency in the brain for not being able to see what's just so obviously clear to you (but then you don't try to actually explain it, just turn up your nose and walk away)
I will give you credit for the WHIO TV source, that actually seems reasonable, it presents both sides fairly.
but you are still accepting the conservative view as fact and indisputable. when they are just as likely lying as the democratic view could be. this is all based on hearsay and conjecture.
like we don't know that the FBI and DOJ didn't want to redact portions of the Nunes memo, the FBI and DOJ are savy enough to know they can't say anything and the President wanted everything out there to "vindicate" him.
The F.B.I. wanted to redact the names.
Names known publicly and known to be involved. Pointless.
Is there anything in the bub memo that Should be redacted?
Nope.
The democrats have tried to play a game.
It's working.
The one eyed hyperventilate and cry double standard. The authors of the memo are playing them like the tools they are.
The democrats loaded up their memo so it would
Either be redacted to pieces
Which would let the one eyed cry about injustice
Or
It would not be presented to the public.
Either way they can get the butthurt masses to cry foul.
It's so obvious.
--------
funny how that lines up EXACTLY with what every super right wing radio and Fox News host has been saying... you know, the PROPAGANDA
yet you buy that. not even a shred of doubt in your mind, and then you claim those of us that don't buy it aren't thinking critically and crying double standard.
and no, I don't know of anything in the Nunes memo that should have been redacted BUT I'm not in Inteligence. I don't know what other operations or operatives are out there that could have been hurt by something that wasn't redacted, something that seems simple to you and me might be a missing piece to a Russian spy or something that puts it all together and now has jeopardized the whole thing. That's why the FBI said it was RECKLESS to release it in the first place.
and Trump played into that game, he could have waited and released them at the same time. but now you've had a week and a half of the conservatives and republicans spinning this idea about a "loaded" memo and all that.. well, I don't have any proof of that, all I have proof of is a Nunes memo that doesn't really say anything and Trump denying the release of an opposition memo.
and now you are okay with unmasking sources... huh, sounds wrong to me.
yet here I am, still giving Trump the benefit of the doubt that he'll release the memo sometime.. . but I'm not holding my breath
oh, and ever think that it's hard to answer questions without providing more information than was out there before... so if the Dem memo does elaborate, well, they are probably just trying to actually answer the question fully instead of spinning more partisan innuendo like Nunes' memo