SuzukiSavage.com - The Horse Is Dead

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members

SuzukiSavage.com › General Category › Politics, Religion (Tall Table) › The Horse Is Dead

(Moderators: verslagen1, Dave, Serowbot)

‹ Previous topic | Next topic ›

Pages: 1

The Horse Is Dead (Read 50 times)

T And T Garage

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

The Horse Is Dead
03/09/18 at 08:13:05

1 - I can't believe that this is still a thing...

2 - Well DUH! No quid pro quo was proven... big surprise.

http://www.yahoo.com/news/informant-had-no-evidence-clinton-benefited-uranium...

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An informant whom House Republicans have said could reveal a link between a 2010 sale of U.S. uranium supplies and donations to the Clinton Foundation provided no evidence of that during a four-hour interview with congressional staff last month, Democrats said on Thursday.

The informant, lobbyist William D. Campbell, "provided no evidence of a quid pro quo involving Secretary (Hillary) Clinton or the Clinton Foundation and no evidence that Secretary Clinton was involved in, or improperly influenced" the uranium sale, the Democrats said in a five-page summary of the Feb. 7 interview.

IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Online OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 29688 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: The Horse Is Dead Reply #1 - 03/09/18 at 08:31:07 Evidence don't matter,... just gotta' keep pointin' that finger...
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

MnSpring Serious Thumper Offline Younger than most people my age. Posts: 10590 Minn Gender:	Re: The Horse Is Dead Reply #2 - 03/09/18 at 12:27:26 Would, Beating a DEAD, Horse, be like this: T And T Garage wrote on 03/09/18 at 12:12:03: "... Have you seen his approval numbers? ..."
Back to top	Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither". Which is *More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly* . IP Logged

FormerlyLostArtist Ex Member	Re: The Horse Is Dead Reply #3 - 03/09/18 at 12:54:28 MnSpring wrote on 03/09/18 at 12:27:26: Would, Beating a DEAD, Horse, be like this: T And T Garage wrote on 03/09/18 at 12:12:03: "... Have you seen his approval numbers? ..." does that have anything to do with this post? or are you just attacking TT, ad hominem style?
Back to top	IP Logged

T And T Garage

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: The Horse Is Dead
Reply #4 - 03/09/18 at 13:44:23

FormerlyLostArtist wrote on 03/09/18 at 12:54:28:

MnSpring wrote on 03/09/18 at 12:27:26:

Would, Beating a DEAD, Horse,
be like this:

T And T Garage wrote on 03/09/18 at 12:12:03:

"... Have you seen his approval numbers? ..."

does that have anything to do with this post? or are you just attacking TT, ad hominem style?

No worries Lost - batsh!t crazy doesn't even know what he/she is saying. Unlike an event that was a one time thing and has passed (like this uranium one deal or benghazi), idiots like him/her don't understand that our president's approval rating is an ongoing thing. Like the jobs report, the DOW, US wages, etc.

It will happen throughout his presidency (what's left of it).

But honestly, what can you expect from batsh!t crazy, right?

IP Logged

justin_o_guy2 Serious Thumper Offline What happened? Posts: 55279 East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.	Re: The Horse Is Dead Reply #5 - 03/09/18 at 21:25:32 And, of Course, none of That crap is even close to ad hominem.
Back to top	The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke. IP Logged

FormerlyLostArtist

Ex Member

Re: The Horse Is Dead
Reply #6 - 03/12/18 at 16:11:06

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 03/09/18 at 21:25:32:

And, of Course, none of That crap is even close to ad hominem.

ad ho·mi·nem
ˌad ˈhämənəm/Submit
adverb & adjective
1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
"vicious ad hominem attacks"

so, exactly what part of MN Springs argument addresses the topic...

of is it like I SAID, an attack against TT's character, trying to associate TT PERSONALLY with something that he's not talking about here?

sure, TT might have an affinity for bringing up Trumps approval numbers, but TT didn't do that in THIS thread.

so the only point in bringing that up is to disparage TT personally. MNSprings isn't addressing the topic. So yeah, ad hominem.

want to try again?

IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous topic | Next topic ›

« Home