T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9839
|
raydawg wrote on 03/12/18 at 13:50:21:She caused it herself, just like Tweeter causes himself so much trouble... What is it with these swamp folk?
Harvard Law School in the 1990s touted Warren, then a professor in Cambridge, as being Native American,'" CNN reported last November. "They singled her out, Warren later acknowledged, because she had listed herself as a minority in an Association of American Law Schools directory. Critics note that she had not done that in her student applications and during her time as a teacher at the University of Texas."
Imagine that, they want it both ways, no matter, it all depends on what is....is. 🤔 Really ray, and just when I thought you had an ounce of a clue....
Please read:
A huge tell -- beyond the flat denials of two of the men who brought her to the school -- is that Warren's ancestry was not touted in 1995 in the Harvard Crimson as the Law School's first Native American hire, despite the ethnic studies movement's gathering force on the college's campus at the time and continued controversy over the lack of diversity at the law school (as highlighted at a protest involving Prof. Derrick Bell and law school student Barack Obama in 1991). The Crimson article on Warren was titled simply, "Woman Tenured at Law School."
"Liz Warren is a spectacular addition to our faculty," Law School Dean Robert Clark told the Crimson. "She is a leading scholar in the fields of bankruptcy and commercial law, and she is one of the rare legal academics to have devoted herself to a large-scale empirical research project of great relevance to legal policy making."
Compare that to the Crimson editorial that greeted Lani Guinier just three years later, which heralded her as "the first female African-American professor in the 181-year history of HLS." While this article also repeated the claim about Warren's ethnicity -- "Harvard Law School currently has only one tenured minority woman, Gottlieb Professor of Law Elizabeth Warren, who is Native American," the '98 piece said -- that information had so little penetrated the consciousness of legal circles that Guinier was quoted in the very same article saying, "Though I am the first woman of color to join the tenured faculty, I know that I will not be the last, and this is important to me." Dean Clark said he felt hiring her would "attract other top scholars of diverse backgrounds." He made no similar statement upon Warren's hire.
What Law School spokesman Michael Chmura was doing when he told the Crimson in 1996 and the Fordham Law Review in 1997 that Warren was Native American is a question for the university, not the Warren campaign. And the university is duly being pressed on that question and others about Warren's time there. (Massachusetts Republican Party Chairman Robert A. Maginn Jr., an alumnus of Harvard Law, has called on the university to do an internal investigation into whether Warren misled the university about her heritage.)
The fact is - it's the loser scott brown's fault any of this is even of any note. He - like every other clueless conservative - incorrectly said that Warren had used her heritage to further her career.
It's 100% not true. But that won't stop name-calling cons like our president and the liar that started this post from continuing the lie.
The only mistake Warren made was to try and defend against it. She's fully admitted that these stories were handed down to her from her family and that she believed in them.
She never used those stories to get ahead. The liar/loser scott brown tried to say that she did - and he failed.
But since when has the truth ever stood in the way of stupidity?
|