Serowbot wrote on 04/27/18 at 07:25:27:

Just how much mental health evaluation, treatment, supervision, involuntary commitment, or incarceration, are you willing to pay for?...
A national health might help, but it would need greatly expanded mental services.
You're now ready to loosen your purse strings?...  Good...

Perhaps start with,
 Reporting, what has already HAPPENED.
Instead of paying someone to push a piece of paper,
back and forth on their desk?

"...Or, actually  REPORT, Violent Crimes,  for a  ‘Background Check’,  (Which EXISTS, un-like the LIES  H.R.C. has said). ..."

Minority Report... Cool...

Eegore wrote on 04/27/18 at 05:43:38:



I think it's important to discuss semantics, because there is seriously a communication issue between those that argue

the word "misuse" set off someone trying to make a point about the media being misleading and their bias against guns. When really, it's just a totally fine and accurate word to use in this case. Sure the headline for a gun incident could be "the killer misused an AR-15 in this violent shooting" or something, but would that really make the original poster happier.  Does he want to force his own word preferences on the media which has a 1st amendment right?

using the word misuse in this incident is more complete, it really backs up all of the definitions of the word misuse completely, not just the social one.  It's not a term that was meant to enforce any bias in the media, yet the OP is so obsessed that everything the media does is biased against conservative point of views that he's incensed enough by it to start a post here about it, trolling us into a gun control debate that he knows is useless and will change no ones' mind on here.  except for them to cast judgement while declaring that if we do that to him he'd like a moderator to do something about it.

He
Committed CRIMES.

Do you not read?
Read what he DID.

Understand that the
Promise Program gives the cops a way to shrug off arresting and instead
Recommend
Counselling.
Good God man, I'm TIRED of explaining the Obvious.
Get it through your head.

He committed ARRESTABLE OFFENSES.

Really, you know a buncha people who have been Socially VISITED by the cops over THIRTY TIMES?



People REPORTED what a scary guy he was
And NOTHING WAS DONE

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/08/nikolas-cruzs-mom-tormented-by-his-behav...


But
Goddam
Gunz..
Bullshit

including a February 2016 call from a neighbor warning he made a threat on Instagram to "shoot up" the high school, and another last November advising he was collecting guns and knives and appeared to be "a school shooter in the making." Though deputies visited Cruz at his home, they did not try to recover his weapons, despite requests from relatives who feared he planned to use them on his classmates.


So, action taken by the cops against This guy would be unreasonable.
But infringing on the RIGHTS OF EVERY PERSON is okay.
You guys are geniuses.

He had stolen property in his locker.
It was taken from him
And Labeled
Found property.
He threatened others.
He threw things.
He took bullets to school.
He carried multiple knives,
Because he sold them
At school

I read all of those things earlier.
Now, they are hard to find.

Looked like he had to bloody murder some people.

I'm not someone who gets
Visited
By the cops.
I Have been around people who got a Couple of visits.
They were promised that
Another
Visit
For whatever reason
WOULD result in an arrest.
His family was afraid.
But pretend the system
Did everything it could
To do things right.

While the F.B.I. admits they screwed up.
And any sentient being can evaluate the absolute lack of cops doing their job.

Because if the system is at fault
It CAN'T be
Gunz
And
Since we KNOW it's
Gunz
It's not a complete and fustercluck failure of the
System
So
Gunz