DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 4471
Honolulu
|
I guess my comment about getting the gasses in & out quicker was poorly worded. I don't mean that the additional lift will increase velocity. What I am getting at is that the cam is going to ramp the valve open a bit faster, which in turn will most likely fill the cylinder & combustion chamber faster. Of course, that's purely a guess. I'm basing that guess on the intended application. The cam was designed for an enduro bike. It's intended to provide a broad power band with good low end. Whether or not the additional lift helps or hurts the LS engine will always be a mystery to us. We don't have the resources to properly test and evaluate the additional lift. Let's face it, at a certain point, opening the valve any more won't result in additional flow. The port will be the controlling factor. But leading up to that point where the port controlls the flow, the DR cam will have positioned the valve at higher lifts than the stock cam would have provided. Also, if the ports can actually benefit from the higher lift (i.e. the port becomes the controlling factor at a lift point higher than .365"), then for sure the higher lift is beneficial.
I agree that the overlap and additional duration are probably the most beneficial features of the DR cam over the LS.
|