https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/10/latest-boys-beat-girls-track-event-story/


When will the women who think they are men join the NFL?
Since I don't see women playing pro sports against the men, should I conclude they are not interested?
Or unable?
Wait! Gotta be able, because they are equal.

Right after,  All the Boys that can't compete with Boys,
say/identify as a girl, to they can get more than the, 'Participation' trophy.

Uber will not give you a ride home, because you have been drinking, so guess you Have to Drive !

     Not to fear, the  Ultra-Liberals are here !

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/11/too-drunk-to-uber/

 I looked back through some of the posts on this subject and haven't seen one that says its "so good to allow males to pretend they aren't."

 All the ones I read say sports intermingling should not be allowed.  Are you asking for people that aren't on this forum to create an account and defend this?

Now we are seeing consequences for pretending boys are girls and the proponents of it have nothing to say.
Again.
Where were they when the the Muslim woman wouldn't wax the MAN who Said he was a woman?
They have no idea what this crap is doing to society.

If I was a driver and a heterosexual couple did what the uber driver Said they did, I'd put them out.

Where is the feminist outrage?
Girls are being shut out of positions on a college team. Who can't see the wrong here?
If my daughter got a scholarship denied because she lost to a BOY, I'd be pissed.
The winners are BOYS.
And the lefties cheer.
While the girls get shafted.
WTF?

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 06/12/18 at 14:13:44:



 There is outrage, I googled "men identifying as women in sporting competition" on a PC that did not have a browsing history (article favoring algorithms) and easily found articles against men and women intermingling in non-coed sports.

"Did you miss the: “…their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive."

 No.  My alternative methods did not include Lyft, Cabs or friends due to the parameters of those options not being available.  Walking does not include the use of Lyft, Cabs or friends driving.  Staying at the location does not involve the use of Lyft, Cabs, or friends.  Calling 911 does not involve the calling of Lyft, Cabs or friends.

 My assessment is that the parameters were followed when providing alternatives.

"That is: “…’Inebriated…”,   Not Sober"

 I stated "inebriated beyond the point of legal driving" and would consider that sentence as evidence that I meant to consider the person inebriated and not sober.

 I do not consider that when Uber denies service and no Lyft, Cabs, friends or means any means of public or private transportation are available that an inebriated person, being a person who is not sober, has only one option.  That one option being "driving".  As such I feel alternatives exist, such as walking or if they are inebriated past the point of walking they could crawl.  (At that point I would consider them incapacitated and this in most municipalities, and states by law require a medical evaluation.)

 They could stay in the location they are given inclement weather would not result in severe injury or death.  They could call 911 given they have the resources and get taken to a hospital (Ive seen thousands of these) for evaluation.  Also if inclement weather would result in severe injury or death the use of 911 would be considered appropriate by most emergency service standards.  

 I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option.

"Did you miss the: “…their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive. The Next choice of the ‘Inebriated’ person Is ?…”"

 By my assessment this is a question.  The following statement would not be what I consider an answer to that question:

"“…I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option…”

 While the assessment could have been compressed it would not have answered the posed question which was my intent.

 Originally I stated in 12 words:

"I can’t imagine there’s a situation where one has to drive inebriated.”

 This was challenged with what I considered a no other option but to drive response due to the lack of Lyft, Cabs or friends. Comparing the original challenged statement to the followed one yield near identical results:

1: "I can’t imagine there’s a situation where one has to drive inebriated.”
2: “…I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option…”

 This would result in the opinion (1) being answered with essentially the same opinion (2) without addressing the Lyft, Cabs and friends example, so basically ignoring that part of the discussion which would make no sense to me.

"Ever found, ‘Reasonable’, as a quality of a ‘inebriated’, person ?"
 
 Yes but not common.  I've been exposed to thousands of intoxicated individuals for the purpose of evaluation so the pool I reference is abnormally large.
Reasonable would to not be inebriated in a location where one would need transportation so I figure the lack of proper planning while sober to be the problem.  Especially if one would require Uber as their sole method of transportation and weather is severe.