Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Welcome to the Jungle (Read 152 times)
T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #15 - 09/04/18 at 13:25:34
 
MnSpring wrote on 09/04/18 at 13:23:24:
T And T Garage wrote on 09/04/18 at 13:17:07:
     Well, in this case mn, it means "shake my head".

Well, that's what you,  in this case,  meant.

Why did you mean, 'Shave My Head, in the other cases ?


I didn't.  You assumed that.  You know what happens when you assume, don't you?

Oh, bless your heart mn.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 10589
Minn
Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #16 - 09/04/18 at 13:34:44
 
T And T Garage wrote on 09/04/18 at 13:25:34:
Oh, bless your heart mn.

Is this the 4th or the 5th time you have said: "...bless your heart..."

So are you Lying, when you say you are, ‘Agnostic’ ?
Or are you Lying, when giving a, 'blessing' ?
Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #17 - 09/04/18 at 13:36:53
 
MnSpring wrote on 09/04/18 at 13:34:44:
T And T Garage wrote on 09/04/18 at 13:25:34:
Oh, bless your heart mn.

Is this the 4th or the 5th time you have said: "...bless your heart..."

So are you Lying, when you say you are, ‘Agnostic’ ?
Or are you Lying, when giving a, 'blessing' ?


Once again, you're beginning to hijack a thread.

Out of respect to the OP, I will not be responding to you regarding your concern for my "blessing".

But seriously, bless your heart mn.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 10589
Minn
Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #18 - 09/04/18 at 13:42:07
 
T And T Garage wrote on 09/04/18 at 13:36:53:
But seriously, bless your heart mn.  


Just can't answer can you!  

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14448

Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #19 - 09/04/18 at 14:14:44
 
I caught his opening statement. He's a fine man. He'll be confirmed. The rest of the show this week is just Democrats grandstanding. Republicans would do the same but I don't recall when a Democratic judge is up for nomination, the ruckus in the room is so bad the nominee's kids have to be escorted out. But this is who today's Democrats are. Angry, hateful, mean.....  

Honestly, let's just cancel these 'hearings' and have a vote. Can't the Senate advise and consent via email?.... or Twitter!

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #20 - 09/04/18 at 14:22:08
 
WebsterMark wrote on 09/04/18 at 14:14:44:
I caught his opening statement. He's a fine man. He'll be confirmed. The rest of the show this week is just Democrats grandstanding. Republicans would do the same but I don't recall when a Democratic judge is up for nomination, the ruckus in the room is so bad the nominee's kids have to be escorted out. But this is who today's Democrats are. Angry, hateful, mean.....  

Honestly, let's just cancel these 'hearings' and have a vote. Can't the Senate advise and consent via email?.... or Twitter!


Well, if the republicans had been fair to Garland, maybe this wouldn't be happening.

I hope they block him.  We don't need a Supreme Court Justice that would basically allow the president blanket immunity.  IMHO
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14448

Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #21 - 09/05/18 at 04:52:25
 
Wouldn't have made any difference. They'd still be acting like childish idiots.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14448

Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #22 - 09/05/18 at 05:04:45
 
.....and speaking of that, don't we have the Dems to blame for this whole mess to begin with? Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy started this whole attacking Supreme Court nominees with Bork. Then, The Master of Disaster, Harry Reid, used their short lived Senate majority to change to simple majority vote, the nuclear option it was called.

Other than getting beat up for not paying a gambling debt (I'm using Bob Woodward style of 'journalism' meaning I can write whatever I hear and call it truth) that's the only valuable thing Reid did....   It all but guarantees two perhaps four good justices on the court if the good guys hold the senate.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #23 - 09/05/18 at 05:40:59
 
WebsterMark wrote on 09/05/18 at 05:04:45:
.....and speaking of that, don't we have the Dems to blame for this whole mess to begin with? Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy started this whole attacking Supreme Court nominees with Bork. Then, The Master of Disaster, Harry Reid, used their short lived Senate majority to change to simple majority vote, the nuclear option it was called.

Other than getting beat up for not paying a gambling debt (I'm using Bob Woodward style of 'journalism' meaning I can write whatever I hear and call it truth) that's the only valuable thing Reid did....   It all but guarantees two perhaps four good justices on the court if the good guys hold the senate.


"Good guys"?  Therein lies the problem.  If you base your good and bad purely on party - well, don't expect good results.  I personally would have voted for Kasich of hillary had he won the nomination.

I'm no fan of most republicans, but I'm also not a fan of most establishment dems either.

A sea change is on the way.  I'm hoping that the midterms bring in a wave of progressives and force a change of the republicans to swing towards the middle.  
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14448

Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #24 - 09/05/18 at 05:59:13
 
If you base your good and bad purely on party

A good side road to go down.

Why stick with party vs person?

Well, for one thing, party ideology is slower to change. On the whole, I think change should be a long, slow agonizing process. Otherwise, you easily fall into the shinny nickel trap where you chase flashy ideas with no substance behind them.

Conservative ideology and liberal ideology are pretty clearly defined for most major issues. Smaller government vs larger government, personal responsibility vs corporate responsibility, pro-life vs pro-choice.

Since McCain's a hot topic now, the idea of him being President with a Democratic Vice President was ridiculous. The VP is already something of a figurehead as it is now. Having one from the opposite party would further relegate him to attending funerals and more useless committees designed to keep him busy like Gore's 'reinvent government' debacle.

Also, following ideology vs person helps decide key issues that are more in the grey area. I'm against the death penalty in ALL circumstances. I don't believe the State has the right to take someone's life just like I don't believe a woman has the right to kill her unborn baby.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #25 - 09/05/18 at 07:53:47
 
WebsterMark wrote on 09/05/18 at 05:59:13:
If you base your good and bad purely on party

A good side road to go down.

Why stick with party vs person?

Well, for one thing, party ideology is slower to change. On the whole, I think change should be a long, slow agonizing process. Otherwise, you easily fall into the shinny nickel trap where you chase flashy ideas with no substance behind them.

Well, I hate to break this to you, but that's pretty much what trump was.  A shiny nickel that turned out to be toxic.  He was supposed to be a "breath of fresh air" - instead, he's just signing everything the establishment republicans put in front of him.  He's done nothing for the middle class that he'd promised to do.  And let's not forget the scandal...

Conservative ideology and liberal ideology are pretty clearly defined for most major issues. Smaller government vs larger government, personal responsibility vs corporate responsibility, pro-life vs pro-choice.

Yes, but as a whole, the liberal side of policy has given the US some pretty important things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, disability, women's rights (to vote, to choose), etc.  That's why things like Medicare for all poll in the 60+ percent.  We as a country lean left socially and are pretty much dead center fiscally.

Since McCain's a hot topic now, the idea of him being President with a Democratic Vice President was ridiculous. The VP is already something of a figurehead as it is now. Having one from the opposite party would further relegate him to attending funerals and more useless committees designed to keep him busy like Gore's 'reinvent government' debacle.

Not sure what to think about that - doesn't sound like a good idea having a VP from a different party - the appointment process alone would sink it.

Also, following ideology vs person helps decide key issues that are more in the grey area. I'm against the death penalty in ALL circumstances. I don't believe the State has the right to take someone's life just like I don't believe a woman has the right to kill her unborn baby.


Then your party is not of your view.  The conservatives support a death penalty.  This is what I'm talking about.  There are things about the democrats that I don't support - most of it's on the establishment side.  However, there are some things that I support on the conservative side - balancing the budget, means testing for welfare, common core, and a few other things (but on a more limited basis that their official position).

As I said, I would have voted for Kasich over hillary in a heartbeat.  I was never a "Bernie or bust" guy either.  I have never - and will never - vote straight ticket.  I take my time in the booth and do my research ahead of time.  I voted for rauner for governor (my mistake admittedly), and have in the past voted for a republican alderman.

IMHO to voting party over policy is why we are so divided as a country today.  No one party is 100% right.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #26 - 09/05/18 at 10:06:29
 
webster, again, partisan hack... why bother talk to him, just look at the party line and that's what webster believes...  

another cookie cutter republican..   useless
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14448

Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #27 - 09/05/18 at 10:51:02
 
cookie cutter? Did I not just go against a key policy of the Republican platform? Did you read that?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
verslagen1
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

Where there's a
will, I want to be
in it.

Posts: 29042
L.A. California
Gender: male
Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #28 - 09/05/18 at 11:40:57
 
T And T Garage wrote on 09/04/18 at 14:22:08:
Well, if the republicans had been fair to Garland, maybe this wouldn't be happening.

I hope they block him.  We don't need a Supreme Court Justice that would basically allow the president blanket immunity.  IMHO

You know as much as anybody it was more fair or merciful that they didn't put him thru the republican version of this circus just to vote him down.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
T And T Garage
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9839

Re: Welcome to the Jungle
Reply #29 - 09/05/18 at 12:21:13
 
verslagen1 wrote on 09/05/18 at 11:40:57:
T And T Garage wrote on 09/04/18 at 14:22:08:
Well, if the republicans had been fair to Garland, maybe this wouldn't be happening.

I hope they block him.  We don't need a Supreme Court Justice that would basically allow the president blanket immunity.  IMHO

You know as much as anybody it was more fair or merciful that they didn't put him thru the republican version of this circus just to vote him down.


Actually, Garland was a republican's dream comparatively.  He was as conservative a choice that Obama could make.  I wasn't actually in favor of Garland as a pick - but what the GOPers did was unprecedented - that's what makes the current protest of brett justifiable.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
12/23/25 at 11:05:31



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Welcome to the Jungle


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.