Lol.

Er what exactly are you calling good news. You link to a 'search term'? I don't get that.

!. Yes human beings are deforesting the Earth at an alarming rate particularly the Amazon which contains most of Earth's biodiversity.

2. As far as oxygen production is concerned most of that is done by single cell organisms, in the ocean.

3. Yes, plants use sunlight to split water molecules and combine the hydrogen with the carbon in the air and rearrange the molecules so that the carbon is in a higher energy state.

3 then plant eating animals gradually step down the high energy carbon atoms via the krebbs cycle, bit by bit, (because we don't want a fire inside us) then when it's completely stepped down they hand that carbon atom off to an oxygen atom and you breath it out. Basically it's the opposite of what the plant does.

4. Plants evolved to use very high concentrations of carbon dioxide. they will grow well in a high carbon dioxide atmosphere.

So yes it's good new that all this stuff works, it's also great news that there is a very high energy state of carbon 12 so that when two helium atoms come together to form beryllium,  before they can fall apart another helium can stick to it and form Carbon. If it was not for this particular resonance of Carbon 12, there'd be no elements at all after beryllium.

Prolly lucky that a meteor hit the earth and wiped out the dinosaurs. Lots of stuff to be happy about. Also what about the amazing fact that water happens to become less dense as it cools unlike everything else, otherwise the oceans would freeze from the bottom up and we'd all be cactus.

So what's your point?

what's your point?

I thought it was obvious, but, okay..

We have more green leafy stuff now.

Plants evolved to use very high concentrations of carbon dioxide. they will grow well in a high carbon dioxide atmosphere.

USING CO2 in the process.
I don't care that More oxygen is created by single cell stuff.

What matters in this instance is that the
Environmental Toxin CO2
Is helping to create a greener, cooler, CO2 using environment.
Gosh,, seems like it tends to self regulate.

Amen

 When you say you aren't going to fact check it are you saying you are also not reading those articles?  

 Some of them indicate there is deforestation at unsustainable rates that have damaging CO-2 factors.

 Also the UN FAO report is based on statistics provided by countries themselves, and because the ability of countries to accurately assess their forest resources varies depending on their financial, technological, and institutional resources, the estimates for some countries are likely more accurate then others.

 UN definition of "forest" is 0.01 square miles with a minimum tree cover of 10 percent to be forested.  This is not sustainable cover for any rainforest on the planet.

" don't care that More oxygen is created by single cell stuff."

 That won't change the facts, in this case you are intentionally leaving out the largest component of CO-2 math so you can leverage information you won't even verify as being true.  

"What matters in this instance is that the
Environmental Toxin CO2
Is helping to create a greener, cooler, CO2 using environment.
Gosh,, seems like it tends to self regulate."

 Your link provides 30,100 results, which of those shows evidence of what you are saying?

T And T Garage wrote on 09/10/18 at 06:15:00:

No.
Not all scientists agree with you.
I love watching lefties scream
The SIGHunce
The SIGHunce

And then pretend that people who have dikksandballs are women, if they say so.

The planet is probably in better shape today than 50 years ago. Prosperity brings a cleaner environment. We don't see that in the US as much as other parts of the world. I'm just guessing but a single coal plant delivering electricity to impoverished areas probably emits less pollution than burning wood and whatever other means they have to provide heat and light.

Seriously jog, if you want to believe there's nothing wrong with the planet go right ahead.  Science doesn't care about your belief.

Ahh, watch him wiggle.
I'm not typing it all again.
The only constant is change.
The medieval warm period is conveniently disregarded.
You say planet is in trouble.
Pollution in the oceans
Nuke trash from disasters
Yeah
Humans affecting climate?
Sure, but minimally.
The sun, that's the driver.
Volcanoes, not cows.

Stop putting words in my mouth to build your shittystrawman.