https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/68475/north-carolina-woman-arrested-f...

They arrested a good Samaritan,, the law would rather see animals die.

Well, this is where we are in this country now....you can not do anything without the permission of the Government.....but it is all for our own good. What is amazing is how many on this site want Government to control even more.

 During Katrina people set up a rescue shelter where they took in whoever but mostly elderly.  They registered everyone and promptly used that information to strip bank accounts and sell identities.  At another "shelter" a group of five men raped a girl and her mother and these are only the reported victims of situations like this.

 Nonsense like that is why these regulations exist.  

 I feel if a situation appears to be safe and modern tech is used by properly trained staff then allowing temporary, and only temporary shelters should be able to assist.

 I have no data or references, this is based off of my personal observations and actions in disaster areas that when compiled and posted represent my opinion.

You are looking at
Prior Restraint.
No.
Full stop.
No.
Punish wrongdoing.
Don't use the fact that someone used a bad event to perpetrate a crime.
She isn't guilty of anything EXCEPT not being licensed.
This is WRONG.

WebsterMark wrote on 09/25/18 at 07:46:41:


 Ok.

 How will that prevent illegal search and rescue scams in the future?

 I agree with trying to reduce the capacity for youth to be desensitized to sexual aggression and other means of reducing sexual violence.

 I don't know where you live but my experience has been that rapists are everywhere and I would not think that any neighborhood is exempt.  Look at child molestation statistics.  I have no idea how you know there isn't a single person who has ever committed a sexually violent act but I would be willing to talk to you more about it.  Finding a community with zero sexual assault would be an amazing thing to study and find out how that happens.  How do you know that no men in your neighborhood would rape someone in a disaster level event?

 An easy reference is the results of the classic "To Catch a Predator" series, and in more detail the book "A Natural History of Rape" which goes in depth as to how human sexual aggression works.  

 I feel this is like saying drinking and driving should be legal because we have AA and we can further mitigate alcoholic issues.  The problem being that not all DUI related deaths are from alcoholics.

 
 

 I agree.  But only if we took millions of groups of only 5 men, and not a pool of men in a given area.  

 Are you meaning to say that you can select 5 men in your neighborhood that are absolutely incapable of committing sexual misconduct?  I think that's certainly possible.

 I was under the impression you meant that all males in your neighborhood, not a select 5, have never committed a sexually violent act.  

 In either case I don't think laws should be selective.  I think having laws that protect people like victims of shelter abuse are ok, even though that does mean that sometimes honest people can't turn a garage into a shelter.

Quote:


Should have arrested all the irresponsible, heartless mofo's who hauled ass ans abandoned their pets. What kind of POS does that.

All the other comments in this thread -especially  Eegore's - are just the usual TT circle Jerk nonsense.