Eegore wrote on 12/14/18 at 22:31:51:

 Lets make it simple: does that baby have a Non-Citizen Mother?  

In the, 'Proof' that tt showed,
their was NO, 'Proof',
that the mother/s were Not Citizens.

Which IS  'proof',
that tt is lying, again !

 You are using a different definition, or just ignoring the one posted.

 Non-Citizen Mother is literally the only criteria for anchor baby.

"legal Need"

 I find this fundamentally incorrect since being married to a US male does not guarantee anything including citizenship.

 A Non-Citizen Mother does not "Need" to have a baby on US soil, but if she does, she has an anchor baby.

"It's not ."

 Then provide your definition and stop trying to say that the provided definition is more than "Non-Citizen Mother"  There is only one accurate way to interpret the definition of "Non-Citizen Mother".

 You keep talking about the Father, which is not in the provided definition.  Have you even considered providing your definition of Anchor Baby or are you just going to keep telling me I am actually confusing a one-sentence definition:

 A child of a Non-Citizen Mother.  

"Doesn't NEED a baby in order to not be deported."

 Right.  A Non-Citizen Mother does not NEED to have a baby at all, but when she does that baby is an anchor baby based off the definition provided.

 An anchor baby is defined here as a baby that was born on US soil from a Non-Citizen Mother.  That definition says nothing about marriage, or deportation.

 You are saying that an Anchor baby is a baby born on US soil from a Non-Citizen Mother that is not at the time of birth married to a US Citizen Male, and will require the birth of the child as a means of avoiding deportation.

 You see anchor as a term applying to the mother, and I see it as a term applying to the baby.

Eegore wrote on 12/16/18 at 09:38:20:

 You see anchor as a term applying to the mother, and I see it as a term applying to the baby.

I see it as, the baby, is, Anchoring, the mother.
Therefore, the Mother is, 'anchored'.

Some like to 'tip-toe', around a subject.
Let's get down to it.
WHY, does a Non Citizen, 8-3/4 months pregnant,
Risk sneaking, walking, swimming, into this Country ?

So the MOTHER, can stay !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Depends.
If she wants to stay, she can.
But if she wants to take the
American Citizen Baby home and raise it and teach it to hate America, she can.
Then, once it's indoctrinated and hates America, it, as an American CITIZEN, can return and spy or cause havoc.

You didn't know I knew about that, did you?
Grab your needle and thread. Your sails are in tatters.
You LIED about what I said and twisted my words.
I never would have believed you would do that.

You're so desperate to twist things now that I've shown how wrong you are, it's pathetic. How can anyone so intellectually capable choose to argue For something after being proven wrong?
Sad, dude, and very disappointing.

"You LIED about what I said and twisted my words."

 I'd be interested in how I did that.  I agree with you, I've said that more than once.  But that doesn't mean I have to agree with the provided definition correlating with your assessment.  It appears everything is a personal attack to you here.  

"You didn't know I knew about that, did you?"

 I didn't even think about it, it's not relevant except for the part about the Chinese Mother staying in the US.  I chose Affluent Chinese since it is rather common and reported on regularly, it could be any country of origin.

 I am saying that the provided definition is exclusively:

"Non Citizen Mother"

 You are saying its something else, but are too busy complaining, and now travelling down the personal attacks lane, again, to type your definition down.  

 I've posted suggested revisions, you don't agree to those, so tell me what your definition is.

 So in an attempt to continue the discussion like adults:

"Depends.
If she wants to stay, she can."

 So are you saying that if a Non-Citizen Chinese (or any other country of origin) Mother has a baby on US soil and stays she has had an anchor baby, but if she goes back to China (or any other location than the US and it's Territories) she has NOT had an anchor baby?

 Is a baby that gets US citizenship an anchor baby?

 Is the deciding factor actually the Domicile Status of the Non-Citizen Mother?

 That and how it applies to the original article posted.

 The posted definition is exclusively about Non-Citizen Mothers having a baby on US soil.

 The argument is that it applies only to Non-Citizen Mothers that are here illegally and using the baby for domicile status.  

 That creates a conflict, along with other variables such as marriage.

 Citizen Father may or may not be part of the equation, domicile status may or may not be.  There is a way to create a standard but its difficult here because there's a lot of nonsense in the way like taking a simple discussion and making it personal, or complaining instead of answering a question.