[quote author=56494F4855526353635B49450E3C0 link=1545150522/15#29 date=1545193658]GuyT And T Garage wrote on 12/18/18 at 08:59:30:


Because jog, I'm not wrong.  You are.

Answer the questions TT

By chance, read the comment below this morning.

Since 1950, 98 percent of America’s public mass shootings have occurred in areas where guns are prohibited to the general public. In Europe, every mass shooting has happened in a gun-free zone.

T And T Garage wrote on 12/20/18 at 06:25:04:

Yeah, even more saturation would do the trick!  Lets not restrict guns to anyone at the federal level.  Let's not change any of the laws governing ownership!  <<<<Sarcasm

Is that part of your, ‘Common Sense”  proposal?
Uygur does not tell you, because he/she does not KNOW.
So you say, nothing more than a meaningless, ’sound bite’.

You said: not restrict guns to anyone at the federal level
They do, in fact the 4473 form, started in 1968 as one page, one side.
It is now 4 pages, BOTH sides.
Have you ever read one ?
(Or did you get the gun you say you have, out of a trunk in a back alley in downtown Chicago)

Now States, have the ability to make gun laws, that go above and beyond the Federal laws.
Many States have far more draconian gun laws, your state some of the most restrictive, gun ownership laws, in the nation.
Yes dear, I know you posted, ’sarcasm’, yet can you not understand, the very basic idea, that the Increase in Laws to prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands. Only affect the Honest Citizen.
They, Do Not Work, to stop crime.
And the makers/supporters, of the laws that,
'Do Not Work', to stop crime.
All stand in the street, and cry: It's someone else's fault.
(As you have done numerous times)

Next you said: change any of the laws governing ownership.
Which ones ? What changes ? What do you propose ?
That’s right, you don’t know, because, Cenk Uygur,
has not, TOLD you WHAT to say.
So you can only say your, ’sound bite’, rants & raves.

So, here is my take.
Enforce the myriad of laws ALREADY on the books.
To get a finite list and recommendations
as to what they are
you can go back in my posts to find out.
(Or are you to Lazy to look)

Oh Yea, and do NOT, let a former A.G. and POTUS, circumvent the laws, to PURPOSELY, get Citizens killed, to garner support for ‘gun-banning’.  (Which totally backfired on them)

And yea, for now, until something better comes along.
ARM the Teachers, who are Skilled and Able, and Willing.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 12/20/18 at 10:23:38:



Funny - if I'm so wrong, why haven't all these guns helped in any of these situations thus far?

‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens


More guns are the problem, not the solution.

T And T Garage wrote on 12/20/18 at 11:24:30:

‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens

Right out of the, 'Onion'.

Even Cenk Uygur is not Stupid enough to post something from the Onion.
And expect people to believe it is true.

"More guns are the problem, not the solution."

 What is the solution now?

 If a person was firing a gun at children in a classroom today, what is the most efficient way to stop him?

 Until people stop with the absolutes of, no guns vs. more guns, we won't get anywhere.

 Start with an immediate solution and work towards a long-term, or start with a long-term solution and let people die today.

arm teachers like the one that lost his temper and slapped a student

there needs to be a way to weed out the unstable from having weapons

adding more guns to the mix increases the odds they end up in the wrong hands

TEACHER SHOOTS STUDENT FOR REFUSING TO GO TO THE OFFICE
^future headline??