Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Sportster Savage Comparisons (Read 362 times)
d3adrock
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111

Sportster Savage Comparisons
03/01/20 at 11:09:49
 
Hi, I know it's come up before but I thought it might be nice to have dedicated forum for those with experience.

For those of you  either have or have ridden a Sportster (particularly curious about 1200's) how do they compare to your savage? What is the difference in feel, balance of power/torque vs weight/handling ect. Any other things such as reliability that pop up in your experience.

One of the reasons I ask (aside from curiosity) is that I'm looking at the possibility of starting a norcal style chopper project. I would probably base it around a 1200, and do a minimum of 4"-10" over forks.

Thanks for all your opinions!
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 03/01/20 at 16:15:28 by d3adrock »  
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 29284
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: Sportster Comparisons
Reply #1 - 03/01/20 at 15:38:06
 
Comparing an 883 to a 1200?,... or a 1200 to a Savage?  Undecided

This is more of a Cafe type question,...
I'll move you.

Serow
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
d3adrock
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #2 - 03/01/20 at 16:15:50
 
Thanks, sorry about that. I meant compared to the savage
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #3 - 03/01/20 at 19:37:09
 
Not sure there is a real comparison. Sportsters are much heavier than the Suzuki. They along with all Harleys don’t carry their weight well. Difficult to maneuver slow speed. Once moving they are okay but still don’t handle great. The tractor comparison is an accurate one.

Having ridden an owned many different bikes, including the Suzuki Savage/S40, Harley’s in my opinion are more for show than enjoyable riding. The Suzuki is a fun, light, small bike. Much more enjoyable to ride than a Harley.

Power wise the Harley has more overall power.

If your building a chopper, the choice really doesn’t mean much because what you will end up with won’t handle well anyway. Not that I’m against choppers, but they are show no go...except for in a straight line.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
d3adrock
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #4 - 03/01/20 at 19:50:18
 
Thanks! I've never ridden a harley, only sat on them where they seem to take allot of muscle to get upright (or maybe i'm just weak).

I think it stands mentioning that most of the chopper mods I would to to the sportster would be to make it look more like the savage, which i'm also giving a chopperesque makeover too (will post pics once finished)
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Armen
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Half-Witted
Wrench-Jockey from
Jersey

Posts: 1454

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #5 - 03/01/20 at 20:09:08
 
Some years ago I went to the Barber Vintage Festival. Saw a bunch of cool builds. Decided to make a cafe racer. Thought about the donor bike. Narrowed it down to a 1200 Sportster. Specifically. an XL1200S. Thats the one with adjustable suspension, high compression, twin plugs, and bumpy cams. Up til '03, Sporties were rigid mounted. Weighed about 500 pounds. Ran around with a girl with an '89 4 speed 883. Did a ton of work on it. Prob dropped 75 pounds. And picked up a few ponies. Nice bike. Made me think a 5 speed, 1200 would be a good starting point.
In '04, they went rubber mount motor. Had to add (literally) 60 pounds to the frame to make up for the chassis rigidity lost to isolating the motor. The later bikes picked up a few ponies, but not enough to make up for 60 lbs of extra mass.
So, I almost bought an '03 XL1200S. Found one for only $3K or so. Thought long and hard about how hard (time and money) it'd be to drop 100 lbs off the beast.
Figured I'd be at $10K for the project (including the price of the bike) in no time. Hmmmm....
Always thought the Savage was a good starting point. Big air-cooled single, belt drive, 4 valve, single carb and exhaust. Did some reading and saw that you could get them down to 300 lbs. Jesus Christ on a bet couldn't get a Sporty to even 350 lbs. Sure, the Sporty would have more HP and torque (a lot more), but it'd be moving a lot more msss.
And what did I want? A bike that'd go 20-80 MPH quickly and easily. And be flickable. Seemed the counterbalanced 300 lb Savage would be able to do the smoothly and easily. A lot less money and effort than the Sporty. Figured I didn't owe HD anything, didn't need to be their R+D team showing what their bikes could be. And there are lots of trick Sportsters out there.
One day a kid I work with tells me he has a Savage in boxes and buckets that he took apart (used to run) in his garage. Says he has to move out of the garage, and now that he has an HD that works, he isn't likely to ever get the Savage back in one piece.
Do I want it for free? And he'll deliver it.
Tough decision, yes?
Not at all Smiley
Back to top
 
 

In theory, theory and reality are the same. In reality, they aren't...
  IP Logged
MMRanch
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Evil flourishes if
Good Men do Nothing.

Posts: 6023
LYNCHBURG TN
Gender: male
Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #6 - 03/01/20 at 22:12:35
 
Funny , but several Savage folks are also Sportster owners.  
I knew better than to get a pre 2004 Sportster .
I used to ride with a feller who had one of the 1990's model , he just would NOT ride that thing over 65mph.   The vibration was just to much !

I've had Sportsters in the form of a 1200 Roadster and a 883 XL .   neither of them can handle anywhere near as good as a Savage/S-40.  The Sportster are the same except for piston size (3" or 3.5") and front primary drive sprockets (4 extra teeth on the 1200's).

The 1200 are powerful and quick , some say they are the "Hot Rod's " of the air cooled Harleys.   I've run mine up to 75 mph in second gear just as quick and easy as the LS650 will hit 40 mph in second gear.

The 883 is smooth and power to weight is still a little better than the Savage/S-40's are.

I still have my Savage but the Harley's are gone !   Wink

Just my opinion but I'm sticking to it !  Grin

 
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 03/02/20 at 18:04:13 by MMRanch »  

I see and feel the Holy Spirit in the world , as does anybody who has eyes to see.
WWW MMRanch MMRanch   IP Logged
d3adrock
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #7 - 03/01/20 at 22:48:58
 
Thanks, how would you compare the different weights and their effects?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
srinath
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5349

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #8 - 03/02/20 at 03:15:51
 
The carb/FI air filter hits your knee - very awkward place to put it.
I have a Yamaha bolt, which seems to have pulled that stupid Idea out of the HD playbook, along with other retarded ideas in that same FI/Manifold region, the 2 intake ports are on the left and the literally face each other, the manifold run between the 2 cyl from your right knee to the left and make a hook shaped turn to the cyls. Absolutely killing intake velocity. The stupid thing makes 47 or so hp from 950cc, and just dumb stupid low tech (which I like) but you can not get it breathing worth a darn.
IMHO V twins are stupid, they end up being either impossible to get any power from, or being beyond complicated to work on.
Obviously people make HD's produce power, but really from 883 or even 1200 they even as a twin they can make a lot more.
One advantage of being inline with the chassis instead of sideways is that it wont shove right like Motoguzzi's and R BMW's do.
Now 650 is about as big as a single could get while still having more advantages than disadvantages, but to get a multi cyl motor, IMHO parallel twins work a lot better. Then of course 3 and 4 and 6 etc.
Cool.
Srinath.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
pg
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 5274
In Transit
Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #9 - 03/02/20 at 05:21:37
 
By in large do you like the Volt?  I checked one out and I was interested till I sat down on it.  I had to reach to get to the handlebars, it was really uncomfortable for me.  

Best regards,
Back to top
 
 

I don't make the rules, I just know what they are.....




  IP Logged
srinath
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5349

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #10 - 03/02/20 at 06:57:34
 
pg wrote on 03/02/20 at 05:21:37:
By in large do you like the Volt?  I checked one out and I was interested till I sat down on it.  I had to reach to get to the handlebars, it was really uncomfortable for me.  

Best regards,



My bolt is a c spec now with R spec seat extra padding. Its about the only setup that works, well its SCR handlebar but R spec seat worked too, but its far too wide bar for highway use.
C spec seat is far too tall and the café cowl is at the wrong angle, regular R spec seat has very little padding and that pleather fabric look alike doesn't let me slide, many problems all around.
Ideally I may want to try the R spec/base forward control combo along with higher ape style bars, but otherwise its excellent. Belt drive too. SCR has aluminum spoked wheels in 17X19 fitted with light trail tires that essentially wear like iron. 8K on those and its barely 1/2 way worn. People have got 15 and 18K and changed them out of boredom. I have R spec alloy wheels too but they are 15X19 but nice cruiser tires are easily available on those too.
Overall, darn fine bike, just some convoluted design BS.
BTW mine was an SCR originally, I turned it to a bolt.

Cool.
Srinath.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Fast 650
Senior Member
****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 410
Valrico, FL
Gender: male
Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #11 - 03/02/20 at 08:11:39
 
Dennisgb wrote on 03/01/20 at 19:37:09:
If your building a chopper, the choice really doesn’t mean much because what you will end up with won’t handle well anyway. Not that I’m against choppers, but they are show no go...except for in a straight line.


I am guessing that a lot of you guys are too young to remember when California tried to outlaw choppers, claiming that they handled too bad to be safe. So a group of bikers proposed a test of their choppers against the most popular Japanese and British bikes available at the time. They took the bikes to a track with the cops riding the stock bikes and the bikers on their choppers. The choppers outperformed the stock bikes on the track. If a rigid frame, raked and extended chopper handles better than the 750 Hondas, Kawasakis, and Triumphs of the day did, they can't handle that bad.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
d3adrock
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111

Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #12 - 03/02/20 at 08:14:33
 
For me personally i think it's worth mentioning that one of the main reasons why I chose the savage was because it was already basically a chopper (raked end, skinny tant, ect)
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MMRanch
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Evil flourishes if
Good Men do Nothing.

Posts: 6023
LYNCHBURG TN
Gender: male
Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #13 - 03/02/20 at 08:15:53
 
d3adrock

I have never lost a SLOW-RACE to a Harley while on my S-40.  I've been  to the CMAUSA State rally every year for the past 10 years.   Seven out of 10 years I've took the S-40 , and never lost.   The other 3 years , One of them was the Guzzi (came in second to a Harley) Two of them were Sportsters came in 2nd with the Harleys .

I've ridden the Dragon more than 100 times and never been passed by a Harley of any kind , but have never not passed a Harley on a dragon run.   I have passed Sport-bikes on the Dragon too but that is rare and the sports-biker has to make a mistake for it to happen (and ya have to be ready to jump) .  Wink   The Harleys are just always in the way !   I couldn't make either of my Harleys keep-up with the Savage guys on the BlueRidge or any of them twisities type roads.
Back to top
 
 

I see and feel the Holy Spirit in the world , as does anybody who has eyes to see.
WWW MMRanch MMRanch   IP Logged
pg
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 5274
In Transit
Re: Sportster Savage Comparisons
Reply #14 - 03/02/20 at 15:45:45
 
srinath wrote on 03/02/20 at 06:57:34:
pg wrote on 03/02/20 at 05:21:37:
By in large do you like the Volt?  I checked one out and I was interested till I sat down on it.  I had to reach to get to the handlebars, it was really uncomfortable for me.  

Best regards,



My bolt is a c spec now with R spec seat extra padding. Its about the only setup that works, well its SCR handlebar but R spec seat worked too, but its far too wide bar for highway use.
C spec seat is far too tall and the café cowl is at the wrong angle, regular R spec seat has very little padding and that pleather fabric look alike doesn't let me slide, many problems all around.
Ideally I may want to try the R spec/base forward control combo along with higher ape style bars, but otherwise its excellent. Belt drive too. SCR has aluminum spoked wheels in 17X19 fitted with light trail tires that essentially wear like iron. 8K on those and its barely 1/2 way worn. People have got 15 and 18K and changed them out of boredom. I have R spec alloy wheels too but they are 15X19 but nice cruiser tires are easily available on those too.
Overall, darn fine bike, just some convoluted design BS.
BTW mine was an SCR originally, I turned it to a bolt.

Cool.
Srinath.



At 4K rpm, what mph will that be running?

Best regards,
Back to top
 
 

I don't make the rules, I just know what they are.....




  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/15/25 at 23:29:37



General CategoryThe Cafe › Sportster Savage Comparisons


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.