I'm a little disillusioned with the Moto Guzzi's clutch-Transmission set up.
I got rid of the V-9 Roamer (Beautiful bike) because the Transmission was so "Clunky". Either one of my tractors shift's smother any day of the week. The rest of the bike was a NICE WORK OF ART .
If the Japanese can build such nice transmissions then why can't the Italians' ?

The V-7II is a lot better shifting but the clutch is way hard to pull compared to any Japanese bike. The V7III has a softer/smother clutch but the same CLUNKY TRANSMISSION as the V-9. They just can't seem to get the WHOLE PACKAGE right ! The only harder clutch I've felt was on an old Sportster (1990's). I'm going back the the Japanese for their clutch/transmissions skills.
Well I'm going to West Liberty, Kentucky, to pick-up a third bike to try out for a while. I just bought a W650 with 12,000 miles on it. My Guzzi has over 16,000 on it now. I was looking at the new W800 that is really only 97cc more than the W650 and the new one has less HP listed in the write-ups. The biggest difference is the fuel-injection.
In reading the reviews on the W650 most owners are getting 60-70 mpg out of the carburetor models , the reviewers only get 46-48 mpg. ???
I've read the HP is 48 in some places and 50 in other places.
When I was in my teens I wanted a 650 Triumph , well , the W650 is as close to it as I'll ever find in a newer machine . Some time this week I'll have more information ?