Eegore
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9102
|
Well at least you are no longer trying to cloak your partisanship with perceived objectivity. ‘Spin the facts as needed, use circular reasoning, and imagine up whatever scenario helps you’ . So says the person who used an elementary analogy the sentence prior to express his position.
Really? You didn't acknowledge, for whatever reason, that my elementary analogy claims both scenarios have drugs in the car. To clarify: Illegal drugs. I also did not address this statement to You, or Serowbot, or any specific member or member's political ideology - for a reason.
So my "partisan view" is saying both actions are wrong, just discovered as wrong in two different ways.
Do whatever you have to do, just like humans with contradicting political ideology to your own, to vilify the other side, but that won't change that one situation refused to hand over documents, while the other voluntarily did.
"First the Penn Biden Center received $54M in donations from China, of which $23M was autonomous. It is a revolving door for dark money. Second, Trump had the ability to declassify the documents before he left office. Brandon not so much, sorry not going to happen. Last, the documents were turned over to an extremely friendly AG. Henceforth, a special council is very appropriate."
I agree with your assessment, also I see you state: "documents were turned over" Ok so you acknowledge the documents were turned over, and yes to an extremely friendly AG. Will you acknowledge that in the other situation the documents were not turned over?
Or will you just claim I am being intentionally duplicitous instead?
|