Yazman
Full Member
 
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 131
Ohio
Gender:
|
verslagen1, thanks for the perspective; I think you're right. The "butt dyno," I imagine, might only detect a significant change (e.g., 20% increase in power), but will likely not register the 9.4% increase from the cam and piston (per DBM's data.
Below is a pic of a quickly made graph showing DBM's modifications in order, and the decrease in time (between a given gear and RPM) associated with each mod. I've edited out the head port and made some other changes to his data to closer replicate my bike's mods.
The long and short of it, is that going from stock to a pod filter, more open exhaust, and PWK38 gets you about a 50.2% increase in acceleration time (as measured by the sum of the 2nd, 3rd, 5th gear pulls between the various RPMs). Going from that to a cam and 94mm hi comp piston only gets you a 9.4% further increase in acceleration time.
In other words, cam and hi comp piston get you about a fifth of the performance increase that pod filter, exhaust, and bigger carb do. It's like an asymptotic exponential function (i.e. "diminishing returns").
Using DBM's dyno numbers, and doing more math, I estimate that I gained 0.6hp and 0.6tq (assuming that acceleration time and hp/tq are closely correlated). It makes sense I wouldn't register half a HP.
|