"You obviously missed it. So you don't know and finding all the sites,references and Me Told ain't happening. You keep playing Hall Monitor, enjoy"

 One person said this and the reference You provided confirms it.  

 You are mad about something that never happened.  Again.

 But that's obviously better than noticing your sources lied to you.

"Keep defending the global warming lies"

 I never did.  I actually have historically agreed with you on climate issues, but something prohibits you from acknowledging that my disagreement with one image is not equal to believing in global warming concerns as a whole.  I can disagree with you about a Co2 analogy and also agree with you on other things.

 But this is a good way to not acknowledge that the very reference You provided, that I read for you, confirms you are upset about something, again, than never happened.

 But we should focus on the response to the lies, but not the actual lies.  Why?