Eegore
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9095
|
It was a response to your comment, which you again, inferred, what you did.
Tell us how the CDC/WHO, (National/International organizations), changed, reporting on c-19 deaths, because you, "...worked to create the dual counting system..." In a State.
I never claimed they did. I described the changes proposed for CO and then they happened in CO. My question is if the counts were correct, why would I work to have them changed in CO? In Colorado. Why would I work in Colorado to change the counts in Colorado, if the counts in Colorado are incorrect in Colorado?
Is that more clear? I am asking why, if you say I agreed with "numbers", would I work to change "numbers", in Colorado? The location is not pertinent, the point is I didn't agree with the initial CDC methods but the inability for some to have an adult conversation prohibits them from acknowledging that. So instead they make up nonsense in their heads like I am saying or implying the vaccine is safe and effective. To which I never said, or implied. I very specifically posted the batch numbers that I considered unsafe. Unsafe and ineffective. But as long as people won't read it, then it is not "observed" thus not part of their Observed Reality.
Feel free to explain any discrepancies in these court filings for Jan 6th human US Citizens that are claimed to be violations of their 6th Amendment rights. Why anyone is ok being lied to about that I do not know.
|