Didn't Musk take over Twitter so people could have "equal" voice?  

April 25th, 2022: "I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means."

 Lets not forget some people think they have the "right" to use Twitter, so that also should be applied.

https://weeklyvoice.com/twitter-suspends-plainsite-and-its-founders-accounts-...

https://www.barrons.com/articles/twitter-suspends-plainsite-aaron-greenspan-e...


 How is this situation different than when Twitter banned Trump for instance?  Besides the names of course.  Since it's been said Trump has the "right" to use Twitter's property, why wouldn't Greenspan?  Shouldn't every human that is not breaking the law be able to use Twitter's property?