I'd say it's good for a headline to get people to click/view etc. and that's it.

 In 1778 Captain Cook landed on Kauaʻi, with the  Kānaka Maoli population estimated to be around 500,000.   By 1840 the population had been reduced by 84%.  Would a headline about the Japanese strike on Pearl Harbor neglecting to acknowledge 42,000 deaths be forgetting, not knowing because it was not taught, or cancelling history?

 Or is it because of other reasons?

 I'm sure somewhere some hypersensitive human will try to say this latest Hawaii single-headline in one location on the entire internet is cancelling WW2 but the only place that will take it seriously are websites that get money off clickbait headlines like that.  Good headlines sell.

 Looking at headlines about fires in general, rarely does the outlet categorize the negative impacts over the past decades, rank the current event, then create a headline that says "The 7th most horrible thing that happened to Hawaii".  Nobody does that.  Typically headlines like this are nothing more than a quote from one human in the article that has an opinion.

 I wouldn't expect an article about this fire to have a headline calculating in damage from Hurricanes Iwa and Iniki for instance.

 

"... In 1778 Captain Cook landed on Kauaʻi,  ..."

Interesting, how many years ago was that.
And no body learned that a person, that has no immunity to a new thing, (virus), which their was never anything like it ever before. They are susceptible.

And when a person has Immunity, to many things, which are Like many other things, they are not nearly as susceptible.

Tell me again how, not having a motor on a boat was required to stop a virus ?

 (and ALL the other DFI things)

Ahh,the completely different reason for the losses makes it less important?

 No.  MnSpring made a direct comparison of the current fire to a historical event, most likely Pearl Harbor in scale of human death specifically.  I compared another human death event to Pearl Harbor to exemplify that headlines usually do not calculate historical data.



The historical areas destroyed that had been there and are now destroyed should have an asterisk?? Because a storm was worse?
Six dead in Iniki,, haven't looked at the other..
We

. Iniki caused around $3.1 billion (equivalent to $6 billion in 2022) in damage and six deaths, making it the costliest natural disaster on record in the state. At the time, Iniki was the third …

You make some weird arguments..


 The point is no headline "quoting" a human they interviewed gauges the level of disaster against history and have a headline that reads "The 12th worst thing to happen to Hawaii specific to natural disaster".  Nobody does that.

 MnSpring offers 3 reasons why that headline exists and I propose a fourth:  Headlines are supposed to make money and they don't need to research history for comparative accuracy to print that headline and make money.

'News' this morning showed photos,
that showed a heavily, tree/brush area,
colliding into a elect pole, starting the fire.

 (wonder how long it will take for that vidio to be 'scrubbed')

Sounds just like what started the Paradise California fire.
(Which was covered up by the Elect Company)

When will the UL, FDS, WOKE, tree hugging Socialists, realize, that when Elect carrying wires are strung on poles, their is a
responsibility
to to CLEAR THE BRUSH around that pole carrying hot wires.  

AHHH,  The 'NEW' teaching of 2+2,
   COULD = 3 or 5,
depending on circumstances applies.

When will the UL, FDS, WOKE, tree hugging Socialists, realize, that when Elect carrying wires are strung on poles, their is a
responsibility
to to CLEAR THE BRUSH around that pole carrying hot wires.  



 When did anyone argue that the brush should be around the poles?  This looks like negligence versus a company choosing to do it because people protest against clearing brush near power poles.

Eegore wrote on 08/17/23 at 07:53:47:


This looks like,
a bunch of FDS, 'complaining' that brush, should, be around power poles.
And the power company saying,
" OK all you DFI's, no more trimming brush "

(While they make more money, because they do not have to absorb the tremendous cost of trimming brush)

Who is, "RESPONSIBLE" ?

The biggest is the UL, DFI, FDS, WOKE Socialists that tree hug for fun.
The smaller part is the elect company for not saying:
"The brush will be trimmed, regardless of your UL FDS stand"


 

Eegore wrote on 08/17/23 at 08:45:21:


Perhaps have your, 'Team', dig into the local, county, state, power company phone calls and filed report archives.
And study the Alexia/Siri files, (Which in the past you claim to have access to)

You will find them.