There are common prescription drugs, but they are typically hormone therapy given to millions of humans for reasons other than gender affirming care.

 So the problem there is how does the drug only turn trans humans into mass-shooters and not hundreds of thousands of others?

 There must be some specific mixture of drugs that could be causing the uptick in violent ideations, but managing to get the crimes to be so specific seems impossible.

I’m just saying/asking has the FBI investigated to see if there’s a common thread revolving around prescriptions affiliated with all of these trans shooters
 
 Again yes.  Yes there is investigation into this.

 The FBI, as far as I know, has not engaged in a direct investigation but given pretty much nothing they say can be trusted what would be the point of using their data?

 The problem is even 100 people out of millions is not enough to consider any reaction to any drug an official side effect.  There just aren't enough mass shooters on any specific prescription drug, compared to the number of non-mass-shooters to make that claim.

 Lets say only trans identifying humans took a specific drug and only ten thousand total were taking it at all.  It would be easier to identify a specific pattern.  Toss in a few million more and the shooters get diluted in the overall no-event human numbers.

How do you know that for certain?'


 I look at the number of mass-shooters compared to the overall volume of living humans of the same demographic and compare it to the numbers typically utilized to show known side effects.  The sample size is extremely small.

 If 20 humans die and have taken Tylenol, that is compared to the billions that take Tylenol.  You would need more than 20 dead to show Tylenol has a fatal side-effect.  I just choose to also include perfectly fine humans when assessing the percentage of how many humans commit a crime.

 There is a chance that most mass-shooters managed to be on the same medication, and that medication is not typically prescribed to other humans that do not commit mass shootings.  However that chance is astronomically small.

"...The subway shooting in New York, the other day, involved one death and five injuries. If all of those people had been killed, it would’ve been determined to be a mass shooting. But I don’t put that in the same category. Those people knew each or had a fight and likely more than one were carrying weapons. It will be hard to find information on this since it’s likely they were a class of people who are protected by the media. ..."

Yep when a shooting is done by a doyboy or doygirl.
It Is BAN ALL GUNS,
BAN BAN BAN

Yet when a 'Gang-Bang' shooting occurs, NOTHING SAID about ENFORCING existing gun laws.

It's Just as WM said:
"... a class of people who are protected by the media ..."

Which is protected by the UL, DFI, Progressive FDS Socialists.

Yes, freedom…..

What if there are experimental treatments being done on a small portion that include a common drug. How would anyone know. Does the FBI contact these shooter’s doctors and get a list of treatment options they prescribed?  I don’t know the answer to that, do you? I would think doctors would be hesitant to release that information.


 There is no evidence that the FBI is actively contacting doctors, besides it would all be considered lies anyway so why even consider them a source?  There is ample evidence they have asked multiple medical resources to investigate and provide consultation in regard to medications shooters are on.  Yes, the possibility of medications causing violent crime is being investigated.  

 The problem I have is how are they getting the experimental drugs to exclusively cause mass-shootings and not other types of violent crime?  Why aren't humans with gender dysphoria also trending upward in domestic abuse, child abuse, road rage, bar fights etc. like other drugs cause?  That along with the huge number of zero-event humans makes it difficult to even come close to saying a drug is causing mass-shootings exclusive to humans with gender identification changes.

  Also we went through literally every public document for the lakeside shooter and she has identified as female every time.  Family members have indicated she never stated anything about being trans, neighbors didn't notice anything, there are zero medical records, not one social media post indicates a trans human.

 The "trans" claim originated on X, and spread exclusively by sharing on social media.  The claim is most likely inaccurate.  The information available is overwhelming at this point, but the desire to have another trans shooter will surely supersede all actual facts.  People will still say this was a trans woman, even though the only source for this came from a human that has never met her.

 I would say it's safe to take this one off your count.


Lakewood Church shooter: Cis/Straight

 What criteria would you need for a mass shooter to be considered non-trans?  

 For me is is the absence of any evidence connected to the shooter.

 I personally don't accept random Twitter posts from humans with zero association to be a credible source - since any of the billions of humans on social media can make the claim with impunity.  

 If the criteria is "I will consider them trans until I hear otherwise", get ready to have pretty much everyone be trans from now on because that claim will be made by random social media users for every shooter for decades because anti-trans humans can lie too.


"So if the possibility of certain types of prescriptions and treatment methods for those claiming gender confusion, correlate to increase levels of violence, is that something that should be published?"

 Yes.  That is law and it should be followed.  Apply the warning specific to off-label use and it should be easily implemented.


Common sense people are not against common sense gun laws and somebody who has assaulted a public servant, and at least one other arrest for assault, should create some kind of hold up on a gun purchase.

 Agreed.