Eegore
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9086
|
"...In this case, Baldwin HIRED, a person who was NOT, Skilled, NOT competent, NOT knowledgeable, AND, very reckless. (Probably cause her Dad was good, and she was real CHEEP to hire)...
While this may be true, in US court, they would have to prove he had "prior" knowledge of her competency level in order to use that in a criminal charge.
I was sued for having an employee that lied on an application and was underqualified for a job. Since I had no "prior" knowledge or reason to believe this human was NOT, Skilled, NOT competent, NOT knowledgeable, AND, very reckless I was not able to be held liable for their actions.
Imagine that, the human that did things wrong was liable and the blame was not passed on to another human.
If the human doing things wrong is held responsible, AND the human that hired them where would it end? The agency contractor that hired me? The contracting department lead? The agency training Supervisor? The agency Director? Head of the Department of Defense? The POTUS?
Too bad the cameras weren't rolling in regard to that trigger pull. I can't imagine that gun just fired without some sort of stimulus.
Again, it's not feasible to expect every actor to use range rules. I can't even begin to calculate how many movies show guns pointed directly at another human.
|