The jab debate is relatively new. Are the numbers available? Who Delivers the stats? Proven liars,like FDA,CDC,WHO?

 And when I stated Lefties use this exact defense against Observable information like actual crimes in their area you thought what exactly?  How many years of zero increase in Dead kids do you need to see?  The same number of years climate alarmists need?

 Who Delivers the stats?  Just show me your local obituaries of Dead kids.  Show me some yearbooks (yes we looked at hundreds in TX).  Show me a single school with lower enrollment.  A single video AFTER the vaccine.  Those "stats" will do just fine.



How many articles do I have to read that clearly demonstrate that the Jabs have been harmful?

 Not many, since on here anyway I read them for you, then you argue with me because the headline lied to you.  You literally on multiple occasions quoted the exact same word for word information I did, but said it was "lies" when I referenced it.


How do others Fail to see?

 Because the evidence you believe are mostly lies.  What would you think if someone told you millions of humans see things wrong and they see it right?   The internet can tell you this nonsense but it doesn't account for the fact that You or anyone else can not point to one Observable instance where there are more Dead kids than before Covid.

 Your soluton to that is to say the numbers of Dead kids before Covid should not be used.  So in that case the numbers of gun-crimes before gun control should not be used.  Sound good?



Okay, so what? The obvious Truth that gun control is Not a viable solution shouldn't be held hostage because I'm not willing to agree that the Jabs are safe and effective just because you say I should. You pretend it's reasonable for the Guns Bad crowd to maintain Their position when it's been Completely Undone by DECADES of Observed Reality Proving that where Gun Control is most completely in effect is Where the most shootings are. Completely separate issues.

 Incorrect, I never said "it's reasonable for the Guns Bad crowd to maintain Their position" or anything even close to that.  I think you are BOTH wrong by using the same amateur tactics.  You just can't seem to accept that I can think You are wrong AND gun control advocates are wrong.  If I think you are wrong, that does not mean I think everything you disagree with is right.

 You want them to use Observed Reality while simply ignoring it yourself when it comes to a different topic.  You still refuse to Observe the videos you referenced, multiple times, are mostly before Covid.  You won't Observe there aren't any additional Dead kids, which is a requirement if there are more Deaths.
 
 Instead you just say the data is wrong.  The same thing you complain about Lefites doing.

You're full of crap.
And now, justify Choosing to Ignore DECADES of Indisputable Data that Proves Gun Control a failure.


 Incorrect.  I never said anything close to that.  I said gun-control measures in specific capacities are a failure.  I also said the people that defend it, poorly, use the same strategies you do.

 You don't know how lefties can support gun control when the Observable environment shows simple outcomes.  This is remarkably similar to the Vaccine Kills Kids approach of refusing to Observe there aren't more dead kids.

 I see how both approaches are flawed, you will say I am pro-gun control as a defense to that.  Why not just show us some obituaries, local school shortages, or maybe a list of athletes that aren't actually alive right now?

The act of the Intellectual Pickpocket.
Get me to waste my time on things when anyone who is aware of the world beyond his walls Knows about dead athletes. And plenty of Other Suddenly Dead.

 They Know there aren't tons of dead kids.  There's a reason nobody is having funerals for all these kids.

 
You are Giving lefties cover to hide from the obvious..
Because That is your job.

 Incorrect.  I am saying their poor logic and avoiding facing facts are the same ones you use.  You just refuse to acknowledge I think you are BOTH wrong.  Refusing to Observe I said it's all flawed logic allows you to say I am defending lefties so it gives you ammunition to gripe about my stance.  Nobody is fooled by this blatant inaccuracy.



 Truth is Truth. It's not subjective. The undeniable truth is
Where lefty policies are in force, gun control is enacted, people are getting shot


 Truth is Truth. It's not subjective. The undeniable truth is Where vaccine policies are in force, vaccines are enacted, kids are not dying at a higher rate.

 There are no additional dead kids. That is it.
 Now, agree and be honest or do something else.

 See how I can notice the similarities?

The decades of data are not in question.
You can't prove anything about the dead and injured from the Jabs beyond

 I can prove they aren't dead at the rates you claim.  Your claim is elevated rates of death.  The rates of mortality in children never went up.  If they did there would be evidence, like massive amounts of evidence.  Funerals, school memorials, social media posts, grave sites, lowered sports enrollment.

 None, not one of those things happened.  So we can prove the vaccine did not cause more heart issues in kids.  This same logic is how we can see that low-gun control areas don't have more petty and violent gun related crimes.



Pretend my argument against gun control doesn't stand on its own all you want.

 I didn't say anything like that.  I agreed with you many times.  I am simply saying lefties inability to observe simple metrics are the same thing you do.  Lefties are wrong about gun-control strategy.  You are wrong about elevated child mortality.  They will say data they don't agree with, but won't look at, is wrong, so will you.



If I believe Something that is not, according to you,true, that doesn't mean the gun control argument is Not correct.

 I never said it is NOT correct. I said it IS correct.  Your inability to Observe that I agree with you is not my inability to see how gun-control outcomes work.



Why do you so Desperately need to frustrate what, in any other place, would be a simple
Facts stated,, gun control is a proven failure,
Why does That need to be made contingent on something else?

 Its not contingent in any way.  Your refusal to accept that does not mean I am actually saying it.  I am saying the same tactics lefties use to argue for gun control are the same ones you use to argue that kids are dying from the vaccine.  You asked, I am answering.

 Both are wrong.  Lefties are wrong about gun control outcomes.  You are wrong about vaccine outcomes in kids.  Both can exist independently and are not contingent on each other.  They are both just very similar in strategy.

Dissimilar things, one is supported by incontrovertible evidence, gathered over decades. The other is a controversial topic, with data littered with falsehoods and inconsistencies. So what?

 So the strategies to defend the inaccuracies are strikingly similar.  


I used information that was faulty. Doesn't mean tons of people are not currently dead and wounded.

 You continue to use information that is faulty.  Insurance companies never said what you claim.  You were lied to but can't know it because you wont look at it, and won't learn it because you argue against anyone that actually looked at it.  How can companies that don't know vaccination status know who died from vaccinations?  Same way gun control advocates know crime statistics they won't look at and can't possibly have data on because it never existed.

  It doesn't mean tons of people are not currently dead or wounded.

  Just consider how you would respond if a lefty tossed up inaccurate gun crime statistics, repeated them for years, and said "So what?"  "Doesn't mean tons of people are not currently dead or wounded."