Eegore
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9086
|
So, all these ULTRA Liberal 'sites', are ALL LYING ?
No, they are claiming families as in children and the parents of those children can leave the State that bans gender affirming care and a child, with parental consent, can go to MN and get care.
Nothing in the MN law allows for any additional freedoms to children in exclusivity as you claimed. Nothing. MN has parameters for assuming power of attorney (medical decisions) and those apply to all medical care, not just gender care, and nothing in the law expands the already established MN laws for revoking parental input and giving the decision making-solely to the child.
At the same time, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico and Minnesota have passed bills designed to shield transgender health care through legal protections, health care coverage and access. Friday, the Minnesota legislature passed protections for youth and parents who seek health care and for the providers that give it. Gov. Tim Walz, who championed the bill, says he will sign it...."
Youth and Parents, not Youth and NO parents.
Major health care providers (What about, 'Minor', health care providers ?) do not operate on people under 18. One bill signed into law protects youth access to those services discussed in broad terms, but doesn't address a specific age. (Huh, no age mentions, golly gee Wally)
Huh, also doesn't mention taking parental authority away, golly gee Wally.
"... “would make Minnesota into a trans refuge state by protecting trans people, their families and medical practitioners from the legal repercussions of traveling to Minnesota to receive gender affirming care,” Finke said...."
Nothing about removing parental authority. I wonder who "families" are.
... The law enables Minnesota to take temporary jurisdiction in a child custody dispute between parents in another state if one wants a child to obtain gender-affirming care in Minnesota ..."
This is the same temporary jurisdiction as the other standards, this is true and should be discussed. It doesn't as you claimed, enact a process of BLOCKING, Parents,etc from having any say.
That's not true, and not one of the sources you list here claim it to be true either. This whole thing can be bad policy without adding in lies about kids going to MN and getting care while parents are BLOCKED. That garbage doesn't need to be added in.
|