Eegore wrote on 10/01/24 at 08:34:20:Now, fair? No-cheating? That depends on your definition of fair, of cheating.
I mean no cheating. No votes cast for Trump changed to Harris. No votes cast for Trump that are not counted.
Propaganda that gets humans to vote a specific way is called strategy, that is not "cheating" if the human casts a vote for Harris and the vote is counted for Harris. That is called losing.
Anyone that thinks they know how all other humans in the country will vote is simply delusional. What tiny portion of the internet they choose to look at tells them, is not an analogue for the millions and millions of other humans out there.
I have no idea what the whole story is but I just saw a brief story, what’s up with Arizona and a couple hundred thousand voter registrations?
It’s not just about changing votes, it changing rules. That’s what happened last time. States used Covid as a cover to change rules to make it easier for people who otherwise would’ve never have voted to vote. Now, you could say that’s playing within the rules and maybe it is. On the other hand, maybe it’s isn’t.
Hillary, and the leftist lunatics on here, cried, and cried for a couple of years that Russian influenced voters by using Facebook and other advertising techniques and that’s why Trump won.
The only thing all of us know for sure is that whenever money and more specifically power is up for grabs, people cheat, lie, steal, kill, do whatever they need to to gain it. The idea that we can say the last election was the most secure in history is absolutely ridiculous. Of course it’s impossible to say that.
We saw what Facebook and Twitter did. We know that if the laptop story was reported as the truth (which everyone knew it at the time) that could have swung enough votes in the other direction that Trump would’ve won. And think about the whole Russiangate story. It was a lie from the very beginning. Everyone knew it was false, but it was pushed repeatedly to the point where a special prosecutor got involved, and it was a daily news story. It was all a lie, and everybody knew it was a lie. The 51 national intelligence members who signed that letter were lying. They knew it. We know that for a fact.
Now, if you call that cheating or not, it’s up to the individual.