Haven't they always been?

 My opinion is they always have been, for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

 At least when FOX was complacent about their lies they had some humans that support FOX and Trump admit it was bad policy.  Not sure what CBS has, but in my opinion, there's much less, if any scrutiny from Harris supporters.

 This post is an opinion.

Between Speaker Johnson exposing his edited interview, 60-minutes edited their Harris interview to help her, and the ridiculous “fact check” during the VP debate where the CBS moderator looked like an absolute fool, it’s obvious CBS corporate decided to up their support for the Democratic ticket.

The reality of the situation today is Fox News and Twitter clearly supports the conservative ideology, all other main stream news outlets, social media and of course the entertainment culture, support the liberal ideology.

Because of that, they either directly, indirectly, or even subliminally act to influence the truth of situations as they convey messages to the American public.

My take is Eegore likes to give the impression he is immune from such influence, but that is, of course absolutely impossible. You cannot escape that.

However, you can do exactly what he says, which is to seek out information from a wide variety of sources which can force you to set aside your own bias and evaluate information through whatever filters you’ve developed for yourself that helps you to understand as much truth out of a situation that you have little first hand knowledge of yourself.

(And by the way, that last paragraph should be etched in stone)

That’s why I am unsure of the articles alleging inappropriate behavior between Watz and students. I’m suspicious. While he is a bit of a weirdo and teachers by the nature of their job are constantly around children that if they had an internal issue they struggle with, that would makes it far easier for it manifest itself, I would have to see much more evidence to think that there was more to this. But, having said that, do I think, if a main stream news reporter had evidence that there may be something to this, that they would suppress the story and not report it, yes. Absolutely I think that’s a possibility.

That’s also why I am very well aware of Trump’s shortcomings. As I like to say, I know exactly who Donald Trump is but leftist on here have no idea who Joe Biden or Kamala Harris really are. That’s a big difference. The devil you know vs the one you don’t I guess.

Look, the bottom line is ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC are all in for Harris. Fox, already expressed the fact they distain Donald Trump, but being on the conservative side of the ideology, they’re all in on the Republican ticket.

It will be really interesting to watch the Harris interview on Fox. It’s supposed to be presented in full with no edits, so it be fascinating to see how it comes off. It has a chance to be the most realistic interview with her of any other.

Another thing that helps, if possible, is to have the human that proposed the policies removed from the information before you look at it.

That would make for some interesting articles.. With names given at the end?

Kinda like the Blind audition idea. Some colleges had been auditioning by putting the hopeful artist in a sound booth, the people deciding never see them, know anything about them, all they had to make their decision was the music.
When The Chosen Ones STILL fell short, even Blind auditions were declared racist and abandoned.
Because, honesty..

Hey Joe, exactly how does that work??

Right up till it Don't..
Then
BuhBye

  (And even DUMBER than Harris)

[/quote]


you should know what dumb is

now that's the pot calling the kettle  black!!

I agree.
Not enough proof, or proof, that the proof, has been buried.

However that, pales to, Walz being a power hungry bully, who is a Scardy-Cat.

 (And even DUMBER than Harris)


 In your opinion right?