SuzukiSavage.com - It's not censorship if it's necessary to protect

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 2055 Longview, Texas Gender:	It's not censorship if it's necessary to protect 10/17/24 at 23:47:08 Ahhr Dmokrucee.. https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1846675214370836905
Back to top	IP Logged

MnSpring

Serious Thumper

Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9959
Minn
Gender: male

Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote
Reply #1 - 10/18/24 at 08:57:45

“…necessary to protect…”

The title lead me to believe it was about Area 51, Cuban Missile Crises, (which was so close to a Nuclear contest), Firing codes for our Nuks, etc.

But is about CENSORSHIP, to make people think a DFI Cackling hen and a Power hungry bully, are good for this Nation.

It is ANOTHER exposed example of how/who/when it is done.

Which the FDS, WOKE, DFI, Socialists will Bury !

(With the help of 3/4 of the big media)

Back to top

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .

IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 2055 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #2 - 10/19/24 at 20:44:37 Can't be talking trash! Boom! https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1846675214370836905
Back to top	IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 9083	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #3 - 10/20/24 at 00:54:56 Yeah how dare private companies be able to decide what they allow on their property.
Back to top	IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 2055 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #4 - 10/20/24 at 01:13:36 Such Bullschitt.
Back to top	IP Logged

thumperclone Serious Thumper Alliance Member Offline PGR rider riding with respect Posts: 6849 Grand Junction Colorado Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #5 - 10/20/24 at 02:15:31 this forum has a form of censorship I don't see any bichin about that
Back to top	standing for those who stood for US IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 29278 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #6 - 10/20/24 at 06:43:45 Oh don't get them started
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

MnSpring

Serious Thumper

Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9959
Minn
Gender: male

Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote
Reply #7 - 10/20/24 at 06:59:44

Eegore wrote on 10/20/24 at 00:54:56:

" Yeah how dare private companies be able to decide what they allow on their property."

Another great deflection.

That, has nothing to do with what a person can do with/on their own property.

It is about the Lying, and covering up, about what is being done, saying one thing and doing another.

But hey, today, the UL, FDS WOKE are teaching the young, The BEST LIER, gets rewarded !

Back to top

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .

IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 29278 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #8 - 10/20/24 at 07:09:47 MnSpring wrote on 10/20/24 at 06:59:44: The BEST LIER, gets rewarded ! You're counting on that right?
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

thumperclone Serious Thumper Alliance Member Offline PGR rider riding with respect Posts: 6849 Grand Junction Colorado Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #9 - 10/20/24 at 08:47:46 Serowbot wrote on 10/20/24 at 06:43:45: Oh don't get them started I rattled the cage
Back to top	standing for those who stood for US IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote
Reply #10 - 10/20/24 at 11:51:49

Another great deflection.

That, has nothing to do with what a person can do with/on their own property.

It is about the Lying, and covering up, about what is being done, saying one thing and doing another.

What I saw was information about a private company removing content from their privately owned service. Truth Social does this, should the same outrage apply?

But hey, today, the UL, FDS WOKE are teaching the young, The BEST LIER, gets rewarded !

I wonder if they will at least be taught how to spell Liar when it's appropriate, you know, with the dumbing down of the education system and all.

Back to top

IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 2055 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote Reply #11 - 10/20/24 at 18:09:11 Sounds like a pinball game,,deflection on top of deflection..
Back to top	IP Logged

WebsterMark

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13891

Gender: male

Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote
Reply #12 - 10/21/24 at 05:14:10

Isn’t the issue that news organizations enjoy certain legal protections given their existence is necessary and as such, purposely publishing edited content for the sole purpose of promoting a candidate as opposed to editing for content such as length while purposely giving the impression the content has not been edited?

The allegations is CBS edited a Harris answer to make her look more competent. If that’s true, they deserved to be called out.

Of course that opens the door to the fact the majority of the news media was purposely complicit in the false RussianGate which they knew was false but kept promoting it as real and Biden laptop story in which they downplayed for the sole purpose of helping tp defeat Trump.

Back to top

IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote
Reply #13 - 10/21/24 at 05:49:48

Isn’t the issue that news organizations enjoy certain legal protections given their existence is necessary and as such, purposely publishing edited content for the sole purpose of promoting a candidate as opposed to editing for content such as length while purposely giving the impression the content has not been edited?

The allegations is CBS edited a Harris answer to make her look more competent. If that’s true, they deserved to be called out.

I agree here. While plenty of people online manipulate answers to questions etc. to alter an interview, it is different for organizations like CBS, on paper.

Facebook on the other hand has never been considered a credible news organization. It gets it's legal protections from a different set of laws intended for totally different reasons. They have no obligation to protect your 1st Amendment rights, and you have no right to use their property. Don't like what they do with it? Stop using it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: It's not censorship if it's necessary to prote
Reply #14 - 10/21/24 at 05:53:36

Sounds like a pinball game,,deflection on top of deflection..

And what does this sound like?

"Such Bullschitt."

Doesn't sound like someone interested in discussion or able to define their position to me. That is my opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

The interview is about a "Senior Meta Engineer" - why would anyone expect Meta/Facebook to protect your 1st Amendment rights and not just do whatever they want with their own property that you choose to use?

Where does that expectation come from?

Back to top

IP Logged