Time + Space have nothing to do with the FBI, covering 'things' to benefit the people/groups, who have told them, what to do.
Again, Hover laid down the parameters, and they are still followed.

 It does if you ask me if it is fact or opinion.  Which was what I was answering, because you did not ask if the FBI, is covering 'things' to benefit the people/groups, who have told them, what to do.  

 I answered the question you asked, not the additional information you did not ask.

 My opinion is that the statement you inquired about is fact since the outcome didn't not, and can not, happen before the event.  This is based on my opinion of time and how it works.  

 
Please provide the FACT, that the FBI did NOT Lie.

 I never said that.  Please present the FACT that I did.  

 If we use the words I actually said, and not other words I did not use, one could infer that I was asking what event I was missing in regard to the FBI changing the preliminary data.  The articles JOG references indicate the FBI did it on their own accord but did not announce it to the media.

 This does not mean the FBI did not lie.  It means I see no event causing the FBI to change the data other than their own actions.

I have the very firm 'opinion' that the words, 'FBI and Truth', should NEVER be used together.


 This to me is a reasonable assessment.  My opinion of this assessment is that it is reasonable.

 The only problem I have is that the FBI is not to ever be trusted, yet people will reference FBI data as being accurate, thus truthful, if it aligns with their Observed Reality. But then we also have no idea what each person Observed.  So FBI data set A is truthful to those who Observed a Reality that aligns with that data, and the changed FBI data set B is truthful to those who Observed a Reality that aligns with the changed data.  Sounds like quantum entanglement, but an illogical version.

 My opinion is that the FBI data is either useable or not.  What the data says is irrelevant unless the answer to that question is yes.