Please explain;

... why do some humans
blame wind turbines
for not providing enough power
         on grids
they are not even connected to ...


 The wind turbine.  How can a wind turbine provide power to a grid it is not connected to?  Why do some humans blame wind turbines for not providing power to a grid that they are not connected to?  

 The wind turbine is frozen.  

 It is on a power grid I am not connected to.  I have no power connections, I live off candlelight.

 I blame the wind turbine being frozen for not providing power to a power grid it is not connected to.  I am not connected to that, or any other power grid of any kind.

 I condemn wind power because it is "frozen" and is not providing power  to a grid that it could never provide power to because the wind turbine is not connected to the power grid that has lost power.

 I can condemn a power source that I am not connected to.  I am condemning it even though it doesn't even provide power to the grid that it is not connected to, nor am I.  

 Why?  What sense does that make.

Eegore wrote on 01/25/25 at 07:59:10:


And now Ladies and Gentleman,
      We will be MOVING,
         the Goal Posts !

MnSpring wrote on 01/25/25 at 08:01:11:

I guess so
What do idiots say?

Who cares if it is not connected to your power grid?

 JOG and MnSping apparently.  I didn't say "Your" power grid.  I said wind turbines and the grid they are connected to.  How can they be blamed for not providing enough power to grid segments they aren't connected to?

My imagination is So wild. I See the ripped up dirt, the destruction of the posts, excellent post,, mobile as it must be.

 So as you read my post I said turbines that You are connected to?

 How can turbines that are not connected to a power grid provide positive or negative impact?  The real question is how can a human claim "frozen" wind turbines aren't providing enough power to a grid they are not connected to.

Let me return to this post: They’re not a viable replacement, they’re cash cows for the owners subsidized by you and me. And when they wear out, they’re made from materials very difficult to recycle.

Windmills have a roll to play in the nation’s energy production, but if based on production reality alone, they are a niche supply. They are not generally financially viable on their on and the massive disposal costs in the future is something all of us will pay for.

Without a massive and viable energy storage platform, wind and solar can never be the sole energy supplier. Data centers companies are investing in small modular nuclear power sources which is an indication they’re very aware this is the case.

Serowbot wrote on 01/26/25 at 07:51:37:



A other ‘DRIVE BY’,  LOLOLOLOOL


Take 50 indecent 60 Watt light bulbs, at  3,000 Watts.

Replace that with, 50 LED light bulbs, at (average 11 Watts for same light) at 550 Watts.

SAVING, 2450 Watts, (About per house on just lights) +.more with all the new appliances using less Watts.

That is to help supply the [TREMENDOUS demand/needs,  for Chip Plants, Bitcoin mining, and Elect Car, recharge stations.

It is NOT to ‘save the planet’.

Windmills, and the very vast amount of photovoltaic, is nothing but a scam.

They BOTH, cost MORE to, Manufacture/Install/Fix/Maintain/Replace,
then they can EVER make !

Did you just indecently quote yourself?