WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 13885
Gender:
|
When we make procedural changes at work, we lay out the basic idea, and then fabricate all the possible hypothetical situations that could occur in our business, and how this new policy would change the outcome of those situations. If all the hypotheticals we can imagine are covered and satisfactorily decided in favor of our business moving forward, then the policy change is likely to be adopted. If situations arise with this new procedure that create issues, we go back to the drawing board.
So here’s my question. Per the current interpretation of the 14th amendment, let’s say a terrorist, like Osama bin Laden snuck into the United States after 9/11 with a pregnant wife, she gave birth, but died during childbirth, according to the current interpretation, that child would be a US citizen.
Is that what we as a nation, want to happen?
And i’m on not sure of all the state laws, but since bin Laden would be the sole remaining parent, what legal rights would that give him?
And I keep hearing strong language from progressive like AOC about how we shouldn’t separate children and parents in these immigration cases, so how would that affect bin Laden and his now US citizen child?
|