Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
14th (Read 97 times)
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13885

Gender: male
14th
01/25/25 at 05:46:31
 
When we make procedural changes at work, we lay out the basic idea, and then fabricate all the possible hypothetical situations that could occur in our business, and how this new policy would change the outcome of those situations. If all the hypotheticals we can imagine are covered and satisfactorily decided in favor of our business moving forward, then the policy change is likely to be adopted. If situations arise with this new procedure that create issues, we go back to the drawing board.

So here’s my question. Per the current interpretation of the 14th amendment, let’s say a terrorist, like Osama bin Laden snuck into the United States after 9/11 with a pregnant wife, she gave birth, but died during childbirth, according to the current interpretation, that child would be a US citizen.

Is that what we as a nation, want to happen?

And i’m on not sure of all the state laws, but since bin Laden would be the sole remaining parent, what legal rights would that give him?

And I keep hearing strong language from progressive like AOC about how we shouldn’t separate children and parents in these immigration cases, so how would that affect bin Laden and his now US citizen child?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: 14th
Reply #1 - 01/25/25 at 05:54:34
 
Is that what we as a nation, want to happen?

 Can't accurately say, hundreds of millions of humans create a ton of variables.  I would say no, but I can't speak for the nation as a whole.


And i’m on not sure of all the state laws, but since bin Laden would be the sole remaining parent, what legal rights would that give him?

 None.  He was considered a criminal if you are interpreting this as the timeframe he was assigned as a "terrorist".  If a single- parent human kills someone intentionally and also has a kid, they would lose their primary parenting rights and go to prison.


And I keep hearing strong language from progressive like AOC about how we shouldn’t separate children and parents in these immigration cases, so how would that affect bin Laden and his now US citizen child?

 The citizen child would be remanded to State custody, no different than any other US-born child whose criminal parent that is incarcerated would be.  I've heard nothing about AOC-like policy introductions that terrorists would not be separated from their children.  I imagine visitation would be allowed however.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13885

Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #2 - 01/26/25 at 05:34:02
 
These numbers are ridiculous. Biden’s legacy is one of corruption, incompetence and pardoning his fellow crime family members. And while this is horrific and forever damaging Biden name, what he did by allowing open borders will cause harm for all of us going forward several generations. I can’t believe these numbers. They’re staggering.

This birthright nonsense has got to stop right now.


The Center for Immigration Studies, a non-profit research organization that focuses on immigration, said Friday that based on its preliminary findings, there were between 225,000 to 250,000 U.S. births to illegal immigrants in 2023, which accounts for about 7% of total births in the U.S. that year.

To put the figure into context, the group says those figures are greater than the total number of births in all but two states taken individually.

Furthermore, it appears that more children were born to illegal immigrant parents than to legal noncitizens.

Although not yet available, the group says that the 2024 numbers are likely to be even higher given the surge of illegal immigrants into the country under the Biden administration.


Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2055
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #3 - 01/26/25 at 09:57:47
 
It's not complicated. Just READ the 14th amendment. The same people who have been working to destroy America for decades Chose to Misinterpret it and use it as another tool of destruction as the liars who demanded that the constitution protects abortion.

And Subject to the Laws Thereof

That was ignored.

Here's the deal

If a woman gives birth in your house
Is that baby now a member of your family?
Of course not.
But WHY not?
You have no relationship with the mother. No legal connection.
She is not related to you and your household in any way.
So Why would you be in any way beholden to the child?
You aren't.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 29276
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #4 - 01/26/25 at 10:16:19
 
Trump just proclaimed we are all the sex were had at inception
That makes us all female
Sex isn't determined until the 6th week

You go girl  Tongue

Do you hear the world laughing?
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2055
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #5 - 01/26/25 at 11:04:16
 
You should delete that and start a thread .
Or MAYBE address the topic Of This Thread.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: 14th
Reply #6 - 01/26/25 at 11:59:46
 
If a woman gives birth in your house
Is that baby now a member of your family?


 Do you have to protect someone else's 1st or 2nd Amendment rights when they are on your property?  Of course not, because you are not the US Government.  That's why not.


"And Subject to the Laws Thereof", is actually "jurisdiction" which is most commonly interpreted in US Courts as: the authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate.  Unfortunately every US Court decision has considered the word "all" to mean every single one.  So "All persons born" is not mitigated with any statement of exception for "persons born" from a non-US Citizen or illegal immigrant.

 So are illegal immigrants subject to our laws?  Can we enforce laws upon them?  
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: 14th
Reply #7 - 01/26/25 at 12:00:54
 
Trump just proclaimed we are all the sex were had at inception
That makes us all female
Sex isn't determined until the 6th week



 I thought the same thing.  If they use "inception" as the term, we will all be female.  
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2055
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #8 - 01/26/25 at 13:34:29
 
My argument stands.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: 14th
Reply #9 - 01/26/25 at 16:17:16
 

My argument stands.


 So does everyone else's.

 Are illegal immigrants subject to our laws?  Can we enforce laws upon them?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 6845
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #10 - 01/26/25 at 17:23:09
 
I would think so

I live in Colorado if I visit Utah, I am subject to their laws
same if I visit another country
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 6845
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #11 - 01/26/25 at 17:26:11
 
JOG wrote on 01/26/25 at 13:34:29:
My argument stands.


you sure like to argue a lot
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9083

Re: 14th
Reply #12 - 01/26/25 at 18:19:45
 

I would think so

I live in Colorado if I visit Utah, I am subject to their laws
same if I visit another country



 That's where the courts, all of them, utilize the logic that a human "under the jurisdiction of" is governed by the laws of the US.  So the 14th applies to any human that is subject to US law.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 6845
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #13 - 01/27/25 at 05:27:34
 
no one has mentioned farmworkers
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13885

Gender: male
Re: 14th
Reply #14 - 01/27/25 at 06:27:30
 
Serowbot wrote on 01/26/25 at 10:16:19:
Trump just proclaimed we are all the sex were had at inception
That makes us all female
Sex isn't determined until the 6th week

You go girl  Tongue

Do you hear the world laughing?

You don’t wanna go down that road. Because if you do, that means life begins at conception since you can identify a biological sex.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/14/25 at 02:19:39



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › 14th


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.