Eegore
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9083
|
Considering what Has been revealed What are the odds?
Low. Chances of that being the correct EIN is low considering they used DUNS numbers at the time. Also they flat out lied, the number is not attributed to Clinton's pay, and three of the sources literally show it. But one would have to actually look at the evidence. Since the documents won't be Observed it's pretty easy to have a Reality where this is true.
I get it, people want this to be true so it's easier to just believe any Facebook post that supports what they already decided is fact. Probably best to argue with people that read it for you.
Why can't there be corruption without using lies to prove it? I'm sure there's plenty of Clinton organization corruption without insulting our intelligence by posting garbage hoping we won't even bother to use our own eyes, and simple math, to see how far off this claim is.
|