Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Musky (Read 183 times)
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9081

Re: Musky
Reply #15 - 02/12/25 at 09:08:28
 

I disagree on the analogy, but partisan politics was certainly involved.  I was at the peak of my 30+ year career in the healthcare insurance industry when ACA was implemented.

With ACA, we were arguing about more government involvement (funding, single-payer, mandates, etc) in a particular industry.  With the DOGE, we are arguing about how the government polices and audits its own domain.  Arguing we should just keep operating the same old broken way that hasn’t worked is simply ridiculous.  At least with ACA, Republicans were offering new ideas and alternative proposals.


What I recall about the beginnings of ACA is during the campaign, healthcare was the number one issue. John McCain offered ideas that would begin to split health insurance away from employers as a benefit and start the process of turning it over to something along the lines of all other insurance which is more competitive such as property and casualty insurance, life insurance etc…

The media of course was all in for Obama so presented McCain’s ideas as a scheme created by insurance companies. Obama went all in on his plan and we’ve basically kicked the health insurance can down the road ever since.

 I can for the most part agree with this assessment.  It is an opinion that I agree with this assessment.  My point is primarily that systems that don't work are complained about, and people seem to be, and this is an opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is, only willing to change those broken systems as long as a source they like is the one doing it.  The change isn't important to them, it's who is doing it.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2053
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #16 - 02/12/25 at 11:15:40
 
Eegore wrote on 02/12/25 at 09:04:52:
Which I disproved over and over when I argued against The Jabs.

 Then explain why the exact same word for word documents, on multiple occasions, were what you specifically called "Lies" until a website you liked, like ThegatewayPundit posted them, and then they became truth?

 Literally the exact same documents.



That I don't know how to do what you say I must Does Net eliminate my point.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
ThumperPaul
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2154
Houston, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #17 - 02/12/25 at 11:57:53
 
Again, ACA is not a good analogy.  You even acknowledge my point that Republicans had ideas (McCain), and Dems had ideas.

With DOGE, the Dems have nothing but “keep the same broken system that doesn’t work”.  That is not a valid or rational idea or plan.  They disagree and rebutt for the sole sake of disagreeing.  And they can’t stand that someone (Musk), on the other side of the aisle, is actually being successful.

It seems to be mostly the far lefties opposed to Musk and DOGE.  Moderate Democrats seem to appreciate eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse.  And dealing with it swiftly rather than trying to put baidaids on it or just try to continue cover it up and sweep it under the rug.  That’s already happened far too long.

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13881

Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #18 - 02/13/25 at 03:18:59
 
I think the point I was trying to make is that during that campaign, there was an opportunity for fundamental change. It was wasted. Healthcare was the primary topic for that entire campaign. And had McCain won or had Obama blended his idea with McCain’s, it’s possible healthcare insurance today would be more affordable and the strategies and schemes insurance companies used to make money would’ve been dramatically lessened.

To be fair, had McCain won and tried to dismantle the healthcare insurance industry as it is now, and here was the reason I was bringing this up as an example, he would’ve needed to go full on nuclear like Trump is doing with Doge. You think politicians, mostly Democrats, are fighting now to hang onto their sludge funds, imagine genuinely attacking the healthcare insurance industry. I feel like they would literally hire assassins to kill people. There’s how much money and power are involved in healthcare.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 29276
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #19 - 02/13/25 at 07:43:26
 
Musk is now paying himself $8 million a day of our tax money, plus he may get a $400 million contract from the Trump admin to supply the military with "armoured" vehicles (Cyber trucks)

I know where we can cut some spending  Huh
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2053
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #20 - 02/13/25 at 08:30:23
 
Serowbot wrote on 02/13/25 at 07:43:26:
Musk is now paying himself $8 million a day of our tax money, plus he may get a $400 million contract from the Trump admin to supply the military with "armoured" vehicles (Cyber trucks)

I know where we can cut some spending  Huh


Show us
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
ThumperPaul
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2154
Houston, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #21 - 02/13/25 at 08:55:04
 
So misleading….

His business government contracts bring in $8 million per day.  I believe this is “revenue” and not profit.  

Musk is not getting paid $8M per day for doing the DOGE job.  That’s what the clickbait headlines try to make dummies and haters believe.

Musk isn’t taking a paycheck.  I also don’t think he’s simply doing the job out of the goodness of his heart and solely for the benefit of the American people.  I suspect his self-interest is power, influence, and protection.

He doesn’t personally need the money, but getting the government to buy rockets and equipment so he can move to Mars (and buy it from Trump, lol) is plausible.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2053
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #22 - 02/13/25 at 09:06:10
 
I'm not sure he's got any motive other than helping America. In a Prosperous America, he wins. A rising tide lifts all boats.
But,if he changes the trajectory of power and puts us on the path to prosperity once again, with the corruptocrats in prison and their fortunes returned to We the People, AND he benefits? I'm okay with that.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
ThumperPaul
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2154
Houston, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #23 - 02/13/25 at 09:13:30
 
JOG wrote on 02/13/25 at 09:06:10:
I'm not sure he's got any motive other than helping America. In a Prosperous America, he wins. A rising tide lifts all boats.
But,if he changes the trajectory of power and puts us on the path to prosperity once again, with the corruptocrats in prison and their fortunes returned to We the People, AND he benefits? I'm okay with that.


You aren’t really this naive are you, JOG?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 6842
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #24 - 02/13/25 at 09:21:40
 
JOG wrote on 02/13/25 at 08:30:23:
Serowbot wrote on 02/13/25 at 07:43:26:
Musk is now paying himself $8 million a day of our tax money, plus he may get a $400 million contract from the Trump admin to supply the military with "armoured" vehicles (Cyber trucks)

I know where we can cut some spending  Huh


Show us


8 mil a day in government contracts
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
JOG
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2053
Longview, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #25 - 02/13/25 at 09:51:14
 
thumperclone wrote on 02/13/25 at 09:21:40:
JOG wrote on 02/13/25 at 08:30:23:
Serowbot wrote on 02/13/25 at 07:43:26:
Musk is now paying himself $8 million a day of our tax money, plus he may get a $400 million contract from the Trump admin to supply the military with "armoured" vehicles (Cyber trucks)

I know where we can cut some spending  Huh


Show us


8 mil a day in government contracts


So WHAT?
If he's not delivering what the contracts require, Then you have something.
How many of those contracts existed Before DOGE existed?
Hyperventilate over another imaginary outrage.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
ThumperPaul
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2154
Houston, Texas
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #26 - 02/13/25 at 10:02:08
 
Here's a question I have...

When DOGE gets around to the Pentagon, should there be full transparency and dissemination to the American people and the whole WORLD?

Where did this $1 Billion Bitcoin payment really go?

I'm thinking it might not be in the best interests of national security.  Maybe skip the Pentagon and just cut their budget 10%. Scrap the F35 and call it done.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 6842
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #27 - 02/13/25 at 13:02:41
 
JOG wrote on 02/13/25 at 09:51:14:
thumperclone wrote on 02/13/25 at 09:21:40:
JOG wrote on 02/13/25 at 08:30:23:
Serowbot wrote on 02/13/25 at 07:43:26:
Musk is now paying himself $8 million a day of our tax money, plus he may get a $400 million contract from the Trump admin to supply the military with "armoured" vehicles (Cyber trucks)

I know where we can cut some spending  Huh


Show us


8 mil a day in government contracts


So WHAT?
If he's not delivering what the contracts require, Then you have something.
How many of those contracts existed Before DOGE existed?
Hyperventilate over another imaginary outrage.



 it's called conflict of interest

were you born an a$$ole or learned it along the way?
your turn to hyperventilate
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9952
Minn
Gender: male
Re: Musky
Reply #28 - 02/13/25 at 14:17:59
 
thumperclone wrote on 02/13/25 at 13:02:41:
"... were you born an a$$ole or learned it along the way? ..."


  WOW,
and a Mupper complains about,
UL, DFI, FDS, WOKE, Socialist !!!

(not to mention, defending AOC)

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9081

Re: Musky
Reply #29 - 02/13/25 at 17:32:32
 

it's called conflict of interest

 That's not necessarily true.  There are plenty of businesses that hold contracts with the US Government that would not create a conflict of interest in regard to them auditing a different section of government.

 It is however something that needs to be scrutinized as discovering the details of bids from competitors, without their agreed upon disclosure is illegal.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/11/25 at 19:21:17



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Musky


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.