This topic was part of the Steyn/Mann lawsuit over the infamous hockey stick graph. I’ve read competing view points over this and this is clearly a topic with a lot of moving parts but for what it’s worth, my take is CO2 obviously increases temperature in a closed system. That’s not even debatable, but the dynamics of an entire planet seem like they would be infinitely more complicated however. The global warming religious zealots have hitched their wagon to CO2, but there are other gases and mechanisms at play as well.

The bottom line, however, is climate change, is not an immediate threat that requires billions of people around the world to be enslaved to a lifetime of energy poverty. There’s no reason for leftist wackos to throw paint on museum pieces or lay down in front of a roadway. Spend R&D funds on nuclear energy sources and practical EV vehicles without forcing a technology that’s not ready for prime time onto society’s back.

Serowbot wrote on 04/21/25 at 07:32:13:


In the case of climate change.

The 98 people,
are the LEMMINGS who are told what to say.  

Serowbot wrote on 04/21/25 at 08:04:54:


Especially when  those PhD's say what they are told to say.

(AND WHEN THAT IS THE SOURCE OF THEIR MONEY)