Donald Trump's ICE agents invade an innocent American family's home, force a woman and her three daughters onto the lawn half naked, seize their phones, laptops, and life savings and then leave them like an "an abandoned dog."
This is the most horrifying MAGA regime story yet..
According to local TV station KFOR, roughly 20 federal agents — including ICE officers, U.S. Marshals, and FBI agents — raided the wrong house in Oklahoma City and told the woman inside, identified as "Marisa," that they had a search warrant.
In reality, the suspects named in the warrant didn't live in the house. Not only that, but they weren't connected to anyone in the family.
This is whats happens when you mix weaponized incompetency with ruthless fascism. Donald Trump and his minions are as stupid as they are cruel.
"We just moved here from Maryland. We’re citizens. That’s what I kept saying. We’re citizens," said Marisa.
The feds barged into the house, ransacked it, and forced the family outside in their underwear, displaying the kind of callousness and inhumanity we have come to expect from this administration.
They seized the family's belongings, calling it "evidence." Since the warrant was invalid for the house, it really just amounted to governmental theft.
"I told them before they left, I said you took my phone. We have no money. I just moved here. I have to feed my children," said Marissa. "I’m going to need gas money. I need to be able to get around. Like, how do you just leave me like this? Like an abandoned dog.”
"They were very dismissive, very rough, very careless,” she continued. "I kept pleading. I kept telling them we weren’t criminals. They were treating us like criminals. We were here by ourselves. We didn’t do anything."
One agent dismissively told the family that it was a "little rough this morning," a gross understatement. This is an authoritarian nightmare.
"It was so denigrating. That you do all of this to a family, to women, your fellow citizens. And it was ‘a little rough’? You literally traumatized me and my daughters for life. We’re going to have to go get help or get over this somehow," said Marisa.
The agents told her that it might take days or even months for the family's belongings to be returned. They refused to give her a business card.

A 10 YEAR OLD GIRL IN JIM JORDAN'S STATE OF OHIO WAS RAPED. Jim accused her of "making up" the story and called it a "hoax." TODAY, THE OHIO RAPIST WAS ARRESTED. JIM TRIED TO SILENCE A 10 YEAR OLD RAPE VICTIM. JUST LIKE JIM SILENCED 43 STUDENTS WHO WERE MOLESTED AT ON HIS WATCH. April 30, 2025

Jack Schlossberg- JFK grandson: This is what he said when he learned Trump unclassified his grandfather's assassination. This is pretty powerful!
A.) "President Trump is obsessed with my grandfather — but not in his life or what he achieved in it. No, just like @robertfkennedyjr @realdonaldtrump is only interested in JFK’s carcass."
B.) "JFK drafted the civil rights act — Trump made DEI illegal. JFK stared down Russia and did not blink — Trump is Russia’s closest ally. JFK sent a man to the moon — Trump gave Elon the keys to Air Force One. JFK created USAID — Trump eliminated it."
C."JFK fought fascism and Communism. Trump is selling us out to tech warlords, at home and abroad. JFK stood behind unions and labor, demanding healthcare, higher pay. Trump is stripping working families from lifesaving care , financial support."
D.)"These men are stealing history from present and future generations — by appropriating the past for their criminal agenda, they normalize themselves in the minds of those without living memory."

You've painted a very vivid picture, but I need more than emotional appeals.

This kind of charged language only works if the audience isn't questioning the details. You say "47's cronies" are committing atrocities,  but where's the clear, unambiguous evidence? Is there a court ruling, a credible witness, or a documented investigation that supports these claims?

Every regime has its horrors, but when you use sweeping terms like "fascism" and "totalitarianism", you're diluting their meaning. If you're trying to convince people, your emotional shock tactics won't work long, term without solid proof.

If you're truly interested in fixing what's wrong, you'd do better to focus on specifics and build a case, not just shout accusations.


If you're so sure of the "atrocities" you're describing, why do they always lack the clear facts and sources? This feels more like rhetoric than an actual expose. If the facts are there, prove it with solid details, not just emotional rants.

US Elections Assistance Commission data IS the Source.

Needles wrote on 05/03/25 at 06:19:27:



Trump, may raise tariffs, but within certain legal frameworks. Congress originally has the authority over trade and tariffs, but over time Congress has delegated some of that authority to the president through various laws.

The court can intervene if the president interprets his powers too broadly.

But that does not mean that Trump is breaking laws.

And it does not demonstrate bad policy either.

Your response confirms my point that nuance and legal frameworks are currently being crowded out by emotional polarization.

The fact that someone uses power within legally delegated frameworks does not automatically mean that power is illegitimate.

You use dozens of crude terms, but completely miss the factual point: presidents, including Trump, are allowed to adjust tariffs within laws set by Congress.
If that is abused, it is the job of the judiciary to intervene, and that has already happened in several cases.
If you think the system is broken, focus on institutional reform, not demonization.

Because that undermines the very rule of law that you claim to want to defend.