https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/breaking-grand-jury-returns-three-co...

If you do a search for "Gateway Pundit" the results actually SAY "Far-right FAKE news site"!

Try again. REAL evidence next time, please.

My claims are legit. Yours? OK in MAGA world, I guess.

Why do you think there is ANYTHING vaguely related to what this country was founded on that 47 or MAGA supports?

Needles wrote on 06/11/25 at 05:55:43:


partisan tribalism doesn't require facts

If MAGATs don't care if 47 is a felon and stupid AF, I don't care if a person is here legally or not.

MAGA is pure evil.

Oh, and Eegore, there is no difference in posting fake news and propaganda than lying. If you go through your posts, you'll see that your FAKE news posts outnumber mine "lies", actually many times over.

 I disagree.  Most of my posts in regard to your arguments are directly referencing government websites.  The three websites you claimed were false, all reference the same law.  That law is not only factual, it is supported by decades of empirical evidence by multitude of case law.  

 What is false about this reference?:

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-8/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-287/section-...

 Or this one?

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNu...


 Or the multiple times I referenced the actual US Constitution?

 The fact you have to resort to insults is a predictable pattern.  Given you do not have any evidence to support your claims, you choose to divert.  

 We could be talking about how TheGatewayPundit is a garbage resource for the most part, but you are too caught up in your own emotions to have an adult conversation about it.

I can say, "47 is an @sshole." That's an undeniable fact. That still doesn't mean everything else I say is fact.

Same with you.

 I would agree with that.  

 The difference is if I stated something was illegal, and you pointed out it was not, then referenced the US Constitution with supporting case law - I would not state that you do not know what you are talking about before I looked at your references.  The actual references not the url alone.

 This is primarily because I have no emotional connection to bipartisan politics or this forum.  Either I was wrong and your reference is a correction, or it's not.  None of that changes who Trump is as a human or how anyone feels about anything.  

 Nothing about a reference indicating my assessment is wrong has anything to do with my identity, my politics, or how the country should be run.  I was just wrong about something, and my position is actually stronger when I am given the opportunity to use factual information.

 

There is speculation that Trump is losing his mind
Dementia
I'm not sure I believe that, but his grip on reality is weakening
Psychosis


 I am by far from an expert on this but my opinion, based off my personal observations, which by simple mathematical probability makes then near meaningless, is that humans, primarily males that are in Trump's age demographic will show signs of psychosis.  

 I don't keep up enough on his physical appearance and interactions to know.  

 One thing I'd like to see is a POTUS that isn't continually referencing the actions of a country that he had no part in assisting with.  I don't really care what the US did for the French generations earlier, I care about what goes on tomorrow.  He'd have more credibility talking about what his hotels did for France.