Well, that was entertaining And informative JoG! Thanks, Duude!
Or,
HekkFaahr,Duude, everyone knows That,,, wadda wasteO'Thyme,, I'll never get that seven minnits Bakk!
But nothing? I guess those hits were all E..

Six views, no response. Just wondering what they thought. It's not like I expected people to flock to it. If i look at something like that I'll likely respond. Out of six, nobody said anything?

I'd rate the video as meh.

Is he an experienced side hack driver?

How many hacks has he driven?

How about some comments from racers.

Six views, no response. Just wondering what they thought. It's not like I expected people to flock to it. If i look at something like that I'll likely respond. Out of six, nobody said anything?

 From my archives:

07/07/25 - 00:39:39 initial reading and link verification.  Video placed in queue slated for 9 viewings, 6 translations, 3 AI checks.


07/07/25 - 10:50:07 recheck for edits.

07/07/25 - 23:59:59 recheck for edits.  Cross reference response packet.

07/08/25 - 02:12:00  Predicted response detected and verified.  Sent for response.  Response denied.  


 4 of the 6 views were mine.  

 I've been in the sidecar of off-road Urals in the Ukraine and Russia years ago.  It was fun but quite a feeling of helplessness when they tip, you feel like you are going to get launched out.

4 of the 6 views were mine.  
Like I'm supposed to know that...


 I've literally been telling you this for years. But there really is no way for you to "know" for sure as I don't pass through all posts.



And why do you allow your computer to do that? It's a program, right?

 Faster than doing it myself and it never calls off work.  Also it's not always a program, humans do it too.



And WHY are You So interested in managing My expectations?

 WHY would you think I care?  I don't even know what your expectations are.  I've asked what your minimum timeframe is for years and all you do is complain about it.  I personally could care less, I just ask so I can input the information.  You posted: I guess those hits were all E.. so I indicated they were.  Now you know.



Or, do you think I'm being rude?

 Only when, and you have multiple times, call people gutless, jakkasses, fukktards, etc. for not responding to your posts.  In this thread I would not say you are being rude.  



You Do know the really active participants is fewer than10..posting something that i hope elicits a response and see evidence that, to a normal person, six of the people I share this forum with have seen it, and,disappointingly, none have responded. But you pretend I'm somehow wrong and impatient , knowing the whole time that You were creating false information.

 I never said you were wrong or impatient, I don't even consider that useful information to me. I answered your inquiry about post count to this thread and that is all.  Any emotional response to that is on you.  



You were creating false information. Howbout you stop doing that.

 The information is not "false" - the view count is accurate.  Maybe you just want it to mean unique users?  If any member looks at a post more than once that does not create "false" information.  The information is how many times not how many people.

 As I stated all the other times you have requested, demanded, or instructed me to act a specific way on this forum: Become a Moderator and create guidelines to control actions of mine that are not conducive to your happiness here.  Until then members will be able to look at posts as many times as they want.