From Grok:

There is no definitive public evidence in court records or verified reports confirming that Ghislaine Maxwell explicitly offered to “name names” in exchange for a lighter sentence or dropped charges. However, speculation about such a plea deal has circulated, particularly in media and on platforms like X, but it remains largely unsubstantiated by concrete documentation.
Maxwell’s legal team has consistently focused on appealing her conviction, arguing primarily that she was protected by Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Florida prosecutors, which included a co-conspirator clause. This argument was rejected by the courts, as the NPA was deemed to apply only to the Southern District of Florida and not to her New York case. Her appeals, including those filed in 2023 and 2024, centered on legal technicalities like the NPA, jury impartiality, and sentencing issues, not on offering cooperation for leniency.
Some media reports and legal analysts have speculated that Maxwell could have considered cooperating with prosecutors by providing information about Epstein’s network to reduce her sentence, as this is a common strategy in high-profile cases. For example, a 2021 Guardian article noted growing speculation post-conviction that Maxwell might try to cut a deal by naming powerful individuals involved with Epstein, but it emphasized that defense lawyers and former prosecutors questioned whether she had valuable new information or if the government would be interested, given the lack of prior success with this strategy. Similarly, a BBC article from 2021 mentioned that cooperating with prosecutors to reveal others’ involvement was one of Maxwell’s potential options, but no evidence confirmed she pursued it.
Posts on X reflect public sentiment and conspiracy theories, with some users claiming Maxwell was offered a deal to name clients but refused, or that her silence was part of a broader cover-up. However, these claims lack corroboration from court documents or official statements. One X post accurately noted that there’s no public evidence Maxwell provided a client list or volunteered information for a reduced sentence, aligning with the lack of concrete records.
During her trial and sentencing, Maxwell expressed regret for victims’ pain but did not accept responsibility or indicate a willingness to cooperate by naming others. Prosecutors and victims emphasized her lack of remorse, and the government’s case relied heavily on victim testimony and evidence of her direct actions, not on pursuing Epstein’s broader network.
In summary, while it’s plausible Maxwell could have explored a plea deal behind closed doors, there’s no verified evidence she explicitly offered to name names for leniency. Her legal strategy has focused on appeals, not cooperation, and any claims about naming clients remain speculative without substantiation from official sources.

 I think it's pretty straightforward.  All the information about Maxwell providing a list of names, or one name, or naming anyone at all is from Social Media and not in one single court document.  

During her trial and sentencing, Maxwell expressed regret for victims’ pain but did not accept responsibility or indicate a willingness to cooperate by naming others


 Of course it's been established that information that anyone in the world can make up out of thin air are to be considered more reliable than actual empirical evidence as long as it aligns with Observed Reality.  If I only Observe that Maxwell was going to rat on people and refuse to Observe there isn't a single court document or investigative transcript that says it, then in my Reality, Maxwell provided a list and it was covered up.

 She slipped away.

There is - or was - a list. We will never see it.

 Or like most modern criminal organizations, there wasn't.  There is no possible way you or I could know.  There could be a post-investigation list compiled, I would think that is more likely.

 My point is people are using "references" about Maxwell that are nothing more that posts literally any human could make up out of thin air.  Would you accept that as evidence for anything else?