25 years as an RN, 10 spent in charge of a hospital, including the ED. You've obviously never seen a soft tissue bullet wound. He'd be lucky to HAVE an ear.

 I've seen plenty, and I do think that round could leave that specific wound.  23 years as a military contractor, personally treated multiple soft-tissue wounds from multiple calibers.  Took a "graze" wound across my right calf from a 7.62.  22 years in an ED (non medical), personally viewed every GSW on record.  5.56x45 rounds typically do not create a damage channel or temporary cavity so to speak unless they perforate.  They will create lacerations, many veterans can attest to this by means of personal experience.  I think the real question is if the physical projectile has to make contact - I do not think it does based off our understanding of physics.  

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6507010/

https://whitemountainforensic.com/wound-ballistics-motion-effects-projectiles...
 

Also, the SS detail that was assigned to him that day was just fired, not for incompetence which was shown by their allowing him to grandstand, but for involvement in the photo op.

 According to SS deputy director Matt Quinn the disciplinary penalty ranged from 10 to 42 days of leave without pay or benefits. "The personnel were placed into restricted duty or roles with less operational responsibility upon their return."

 This is more in accordance with disciplinary action, where did you see they were fired?

The bullet nicked his ear. Pretty simple. The fact that Trump came out with some giant bandage on it here one day was just stupid. I’ve had way more serious cuts than that wound with less bandage. Maybe that’s what the doctor ordered to make extra sure there’s no infection. I have no idea. It was just a bad visual. As far as I know, I only saw him with that on one time.

The bigger picture is, if anyone thinks that was some conspiracy, a set up, an act, a ploy, you’ve got TDS. Remember that comedy routine, you might be a redneck? If you think the Butler shooting was staged, you might have TDS.

As far as proving what I say, some of you have already shown me that giving you proof is a waste of my time.

 Your proof is typically more words with zero reference.

 Show proof or it's a lie is your thing.  Isn't it acceptable for people to expect the same?  It's not new here, people have done the whole "liar" routine here before.  

 Show proof that the SS detail that was assigned to him that day was just fired, not for incompetence which was shown by their allowing him to grandstand, but for involvement in the photo op or it's a lie.

 See how that works?