So? Have they studied the history of earth's climate? Do they know about the numerous ice ages? How they explain the marine fossils in mountains? They know FukkALL. The world has been in a state of constant change. And that has nothing to do with the political climate. You can't STAND the fact that OBSERVATION is THE number One step in making decisions and coming to Intelligent conclusions.

 All one has to do is not Observe something, and it is no longer part of their Reality.  Climate alarmists won't Observe "the history of earth's climate" and you will not Observe cardiac deaths in children before 2020.

 So as long as they do not Observe it, all data claiming climate change is not man made is no longer matching their Observed Reality.  So obviously it is wrong.  Right?  

 Also all data showing there are no indications that significantly more kids died in 2021 than the decade before is wrong because you Observed a few kids die on "live tv".  Right?  Your Observations will decide the if the national mortality rate of kids is accurate or not.

 You refuse to Observe I am saying Observed reality is a poor qualifier for data or reference.  People Observe different things.  
 

It not that it, has/not, been observed.
It is simply repeating LIES, like the, 'Full Blown Socialist', that posts here.

 That's definitely part of it.  It makes it easier when one refuses to Observe anything that is counter to the lies they want to repeat.

The "full blown socialist" is not lying.

 Except for the lies.  Like the rancher being a "Corporation" or that the US Senate passes impeachment hearings to a "Federal Court" or that the rancher "tied things up" in court by filing one appeal, or that all watershed is in the CWA, or the Mexican President made a specific speech/response, or that your family members in TN have zero access to healthcare of "ANY KIND".

 

Prove it or you're the one lying.

 Ok, present your proof as well.  Use your own standards - provide proof there needs to be a "WARRANT" for LEO to wear masks.

 I already offered proof when I provided references.  You claim the literal US Constitution from the Congress.gov website is a "fake MAGA website"

 Proof of Treason clause as referenced:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S3-C1-1/ALDE_00013524/
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S3-C1-1/ALDE_00013524/
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edi...
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S4-4-9/ALDE_00000035/

 Your provided references = 0


 Proof the EPA and all courts involved did not recognize Andrew Johnson as a "Corporation" or affiliate of any kind of business.

https://pacificlegal.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/johnson-v-environmental-prote...


https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/rhc/epaadmin.nsf/filings/6c6ec0f783d2b53985257c7c...


 Proof of EPA water data assessments indicating Blacks Fork is not navigable water as required in the CWA:

https://waterdata.usgs.gov/monitoring-location/USGS-09217900/#dataTypeId=continu



 Proof that not all watershed is applicable to the CWA:

https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-act

 Proof of activities exempt stock ponds:

https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/exemptions-permit-requirements-under-cwa-section-404


 Your provided proof = nothing.

 
 Proof, using your own reference, that the statement from Claudia Sheinbaum is false:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/feb/12/facebook-posts/no-mexican-p...

 Your proof that she did = nothing.


 Proof humans in TN have mandatory access to emergency healthcare:

https://www.hcadam.com/api/public/content/7db8935ad36346afad4a32e332121772?v=...
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/emergency-medic...
https://www.hipaajournal.com/hhs-oig-settles-alleged-emtala-violations-tn-mo/

 Your proof that over 50 humans in your family have "no access to healthcare of ANY kind." = 0


 Based off your own statements, you should present your proof or you are lying.  Just like you said you would "in passing" by the way.

You're wrong NOW. Accept it.

Real proof has no meaning for conservatives. You'll just discount the evidence, or attack the source, or the person revealing it to you. MAGATs are limited in that way...

Actions speak louder than words. Your posts show that you, as a well-to-do capitalist supporter, are a 47 kisser of backside.