This is like the guy that made that movie 3000 mules. I watched a little bit of it and he showed video footage of people dropping off ballots. Then he tracked their phones and showed maps proving they came by the same area repeatedly……yet there was never a second video of that same person dropping off more ballots in the same box. Why? If I was trying to prove fraud, and I had a video of the same person repeatedly coming to the same ballot box, that would be the thing I would show the most because that proves fraud. The movie didn’t show that. Yet countless believe the movie was legitimate evidence of fraud.

 This is a good example as well.  My opinion is that people will "believe" it because they want it to be true.  This creates the double standard of scrutinizing evidence for one thing, but not another.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Ghislaine+got+a+box+what+was+in+it&ia=web

Why are not the TDS infected, interested in 'The Box' ?

So,the evidence doesn't exist,, odd that

 It exists, but some will choose not not Observe certain aspects, thus not scrutinizing it to the degree they do other evidence.

You know, if 47 really won by a landslide, no red state would even THINK about redistricting. Just sayin'.