Eegore wrote on 08/15/25 at 07:58:19:Yes, there were Millions of death certificates.
That said 'Died From COVID'.
NOT, WITH, COVID !
But no one is going to dig them up to find out.
Except multiple organizations did. This exemplifies my point - JOG correctly assesses that if empirical evidence exists there would be zero reason for it to be withheld. But not one person on the planet will look up the CDC guidance that 'SAID" to input humans "with" covid as dying "from" Covid.
Not one person ever looked that information up?
There are supposedly death certs listing blunt impact trauma from vehicular speed listed as dying "from" Covid, but not one, which would be absolute "proof" has been used as evidence?
That's as unlikely as "the media" having "proof" "that shows Trump is a pedo and child rapist" - But no one is going to dig them up to find out.
So the logic applies to one topic, but doesn't apply to another.
This is correct. While it is an arguable point to say some unknown number of people with previous serious health issues died WITH Covid as opposed died FROM Covid, if someone was killed in an auto crash yet the death certificate said Covid, that would be easily revealed. And there would have to tens of thousands of instances like this to artificially inflate the death toll.
This is like the guy that made that movie 3000 mules. I watched a little bit of it and he showed video footage of people dropping off ballots. Then he tracked their phones and showed maps proving they came by the same area repeatedly……yet there was never a second video of that same person dropping off more ballots in the same box. Why? If I was trying to prove fraud, and I had a video of the same person repeatedly coming to the same ballot box, that would be the thing I would show the most because that proves fraud. The movie didn’t show that. Yet countless believe the movie was legitimate evidence of fraud.