Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 
Send Topic Print
Hard facts (Read 1450 times)
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1354
AR
Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #255 - Today at 07:49:18
 
The CBO reports that 96% of the extra costs of tariffs is borne by the consumer.

NOT an opinion.




Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14552

Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #256 - Today at 09:20:30
 
Needles wrote on Today at 07:49:18:
The CBO reports that 96% of the extra costs of tariffs is borne by the consumer.

NOT an opinion.

I seriously doubt that.


Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 10019

Re: Hard facts
Reply #257 - Today at 09:34:56
 

"I seriously doubt that."

 The CBO may report it that way but they got most of that information, in my opinion, from the Kiel Institute report found here:

 

https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-im...

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 7326
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #258 - Today at 09:40:27
 
[quote author=6D5F58494E5F48775B48513A0 link=1761226520/255#256 date=1769016030][quote author=5E7575747C7563100 link=1761226520/255#255 date=1769010558]The CBO reports that 96% of the extra costs of tariffs is borne by the consumer

I seriously doubt that.

your brain worm is taking over!


Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14552

Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #259 - Today at 13:59:26
 
Eegore wrote on Today at 09:34:56:
"I seriously doubt that."

 The CBO may report it that way but they got most of that information, in my opinion, from the Kiel Institute report found here:

 

https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-im...



I work for an international company and many of our overseas suppliers were subject to tariffs. Some made the point of telling us they were not passing on the cost, they’d cover it, some did pass on a part of the cost, some passed on all the cost but as of this point, we did not pass along any costs to a customer in the form of a price increase. And by the way, eating the cost was often times accomplished with a price decrease to make up for the fact the exporter paid the tariff and passed that cost onto us. Don’t think a foreign manufacturing company and exporter they used are separate. They may be technically separate, but they operate together in situations like this often.

I go back to the question which I’ve asked many times, and which I’ve heard others ask, there was a big push to increase minimum wage, which is a cost, but there was no concern about if this would be passed on to the consumer. The consensus was the companies would just eat that cost and not pass that cost along to the consumer. In fact, it was expected of them.

Why is it not expected companies should eat the tariff?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
01/21/26 at 16:25:34



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Hard facts


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.