Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 
Send Topic Print
Hard facts (Read 1478 times)
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1356
AR
Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #255 - Yesterday at 07:49:18
 
The CBO reports that 96% of the extra costs of tariffs is borne by the consumer.

NOT an opinion.




Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14552

Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #256 - Yesterday at 09:20:30
 
Needles wrote on Yesterday at 07:49:18:
The CBO reports that 96% of the extra costs of tariffs is borne by the consumer.

NOT an opinion.

I seriously doubt that.


Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 10021

Re: Hard facts
Reply #257 - Yesterday at 09:34:56
 

"I seriously doubt that."

 The CBO may report it that way but they got most of that information, in my opinion, from the Kiel Institute report found here:

 

https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-im...

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 7327
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #258 - Yesterday at 09:40:27
 
[quote author=6D5F58494E5F48775B48513A0 link=1761226520/255#256 date=1769016030][quote author=5E7575747C7563100 link=1761226520/255#255 date=1769010558]The CBO reports that 96% of the extra costs of tariffs is borne by the consumer

I seriously doubt that.

your brain worm is taking over!


Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14552

Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #259 - Yesterday at 13:59:26
 
Eegore wrote on Yesterday at 09:34:56:
"I seriously doubt that."

 The CBO may report it that way but they got most of that information, in my opinion, from the Kiel Institute report found here:

 

https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-im...



I work for an international company and many of our overseas suppliers were subject to tariffs. Some made the point of telling us they were not passing on the cost, they’d cover it, some did pass on a part of the cost, some passed on all the cost but as of this point, we did not pass along any costs to a customer in the form of a price increase. And by the way, eating the cost was often times accomplished with a price decrease to make up for the fact the exporter paid the tariff and passed that cost onto us. Don’t think a foreign manufacturing company and exporter they used are separate. They may be technically separate, but they operate together in situations like this often.

I go back to the question which I’ve asked many times, and which I’ve heard others ask, there was a big push to increase minimum wage, which is a cost, but there was no concern about if this would be passed on to the consumer. The consensus was the companies would just eat that cost and not pass that cost along to the consumer. In fact, it was expected of them.

Why is it not expected companies should eat the tariff?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 7327
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #260 - Yesterday at 21:57:03
 
what percentage of all our suppliers is that?
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1356
AR
Gender: male
Re: Hard facts
Reply #261 - Today at 06:01:50
 
The minimum wage argument is just BS. You can't argue that prices will increase with a higher minimum wage when the prices increased anyway. Very simply, it is capitalist greed. The corporations refuse to make LESS than they've made in the past. They pay their top management many times what they are worth, and pay the workers, who are the REAL source of their wealth, like garbage. That also means US capitalism can NOT compete on the world markets.



Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 10021

Re: Hard facts
Reply #262 - Today at 06:45:52
 
I go back to the question which I’ve asked many times, and which I’ve heard others ask, there was a big push to increase minimum wage, which is a cost, but there was no concern about if this would be passed on to the consumer. The consensus was the companies would just eat that cost and not pass that cost along to the consumer. In fact, it was expected of them.

Why is it not expected companies should eat the tariff?


 I think, which implies this is an opinion, that tariffs and base wages are fundamentally different in how they apply cost to a business.  

 For instance I can very accurately calculate this years wages cost and formulate a rather accurate potential cost for 2026.  I can not do this with tariffs.  I bought some drone sensors that run about $1200 each and paid 1200 in import fees each.  I can not simply absorb the increase in cost during the time that tariffs were that high.  

 Now those tariffs are much lower and I could easily absorb the cost.  The problem is not tariffs in general, it is the current instability and fluctuations.  This is an opinion.  An example is the market reaction to Trump stating he will increase tariffs on select EU nations because they do not support his Greenland approach, then the market adjustment when Trump said he would not follow through.  
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 10021

Re: Hard facts
Reply #263 - Today at 06:50:24
 
The minimum wage argument is just BS. You can't argue that prices will increase with a higher minimum wage when the prices increased anyway. Very simply, it is capitalist greed. The corporations refuse to make LESS than they've made in the past. They pay their top management many times what they are worth, and pay the workers, who are the REAL source of their wealth, like garbage. That also means US capitalism can NOT compete on the world markets.

 I can say that the local pizza joint had to increase prices they otherwise would not increase based off the increase in minimum wage.  

 They did have other options, like reducing staff.  The owner makes about 60k a year, so I guess he could take a cut and get a part-time job, but I think it's more realistic to add a dollar to the delivery fee and 30 cents to the chicken toppings.  This is my opinion.

 I know a number of businesses where the minimum wage directly impacts their profit margin.  
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
buster6315
Senior Member
****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 407

Re: Hard facts
Reply #264 - Today at 08:28:12
 
thumperclone wrote on 10/23/25 at 08:55:41:
 
Now America is run by Trump.
Trump will go down in history as the best president America has ever had.


A malignant narcissist with incipient dementia the best?
not hardly
he's neck and neck with Nixon as the worst
[/quote]
Typical of the left wackos:  they have no ideas to put forward, so they resort to personal attacks.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
01/22/26 at 08:43:18



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Hard facts


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.