SuzukiSavage.com - War on Drugs

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 9913	Re: War on Drugs Reply #60 - 12/07/25 at 07:31:30 So the idea that Venezuelan fishing boats are flooding the U.S. with fentanyl is not just wrong — it’s physically impossible. Nobody thinks those boats are coming to the US. We are bombing the humans and the drugs.
Back to top	IP Logged

Needles Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1207 AR Gender:	Re: War on Drugs Reply #61 - 12/07/25 at 09:08:52 There are no drugs. We are bombing fishermen. It's illegal.
Back to top	IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9913

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #62 - 12/07/25 at 10:06:16

There are no drugs. We are bombing fishermen. It's illegal.

So if the goal is to illegally bomb fisherman then the boats don't need enough fuel to get to the US. We are bombing the operators of those boats.

Nobody thinks those specific boats are coming to the US, fuel amount isn't a valid argument. We bomb factories, those factories will never have enough fuel to make it to the US.

Back to top

IP Logged

Needles

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1207
AR
Gender: male

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #63 - 12/07/25 at 10:14:42

If they're not capable of getting here, they cannot be smuggling. Nearly all of the fentanyl coming into the states comes across the border, smuggled in land vehicles, not boats. Maybe, if ICE was not so busy arresting innocent people, they'd be able to actually patrol the borders. You can blow up Vinnie fishing boats until the cows come home and not put a dent in the real fentanyl trade.

Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9913

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #64 - 12/07/25 at 11:00:17

If they're not capable of getting here, they cannot be smuggling.

That's not even close to being true and you know that. Smuggling does not require a direct unimpeded travel to a final destination.

Killing humans on boats is the goal. The amount of fuel is not pertinent to that goal. Claiming a boat, or any mode of transportation can not be smuggling unless it has enough fuel on-board to reach the US is asinine.

By your logic a truck full of fentanyl that doesn't have enough fuel to get to the US, "cannot be smuggling". Also it doesn't matter because killing the operators is the goal, they could be sitting on the side of the road with no fuel at all. Fuel amount is not relevant, they could simply pass the illegal goods onto another method of transportation - we all know this, which is why the fuel argument is completely pointless.

Back to top

IP Logged

Needles

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1207
AR
Gender: male

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #65 - 12/07/25 at 14:19:04

But, you do not KNOW they are carrying drugs, do you? And, even if they ARE, it's illegal AF. One of the illegal acts Nixon was impeached for was ordering the crooked-assed CIA to target "known" smugglers for assasination while they were on foreign soil. So, you're giving the Liar in Chief a pass for things that had Nixon stepping down in disgrace. MAGATs are two-faced.

Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

MnSpring Serious Thumper Offline Younger than most people my age. Posts: 10582 Minn Gender:	Re: War on Drugs Reply #66 - 12/07/25 at 15:38:34 Needles wrote on 12/07/25 at 14:19:04: *"... you do not KNOW they are carrying drugs,..."* I believe it is a Duck, Because. It Looks like a Duck It Walks like a Duck It Quacks like a Duck It Smells like a Duck So, it IS a DUCK !
Back to top	Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither". Which is *More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly* . IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9913

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #67 - 12/07/25 at 16:18:15

But, you do not KNOW they are carrying drugs, do you?

I never said they were. I KNOW as much as you KNOW. I never claimed to KNOW the contents of any of those boats.

So, you're giving the Liar in Chief a pass for things that had Nixon stepping down in disgrace.

Your inability to accept anything besides absolute agreement on any topic is not equal to me supporting Trump. I never said any of this is legal, I never said anything close to that.

I said fuel levels of boats is a poor argument - the goal is to kill the humans and destroy the contents of the boat. Your "illogical" and immature behavior prevents you from acknowledging that statement at face value. You must make everything about Trump, or MAGA for some reason.

Those boats (or any method of transportation) do not need enough fuel on board to arrive at a US coast to be smuggling. That statement does not mean they actually have drugs on board. That statement does not mean military actions are legal.

Back to top

IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9913

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #68 - 12/07/25 at 16:20:07

I believe it is a Duck,
Because.
It Looks like a Duck
It Walks like a Duck
It Quacks like a Duck
It Smells like a Duck

So, it IS a DUCK !

I find it interesting the Government, and "The media" can't be trusted except for this one thing. A simple missile hitting a balloon is a massive cover up, can't trust that video, but we can trust these boat videos.

Back to top

IP Logged

Needles Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1207 AR Gender:	Re: War on Drugs Reply #69 - 12/08/25 at 10:35:33 "Smuggling" anything MEANS they have contraband and are transporting it. MAGAT bullshit does not apply.
Back to top	IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 9913	Re: War on Drugs Reply #70 - 12/08/25 at 12:43:34 "Smuggling" anything MEANS they have contraband and are transporting it. MAGAT bullshit does not apply. According to you there has to be enough fuel (or potentially other means) to reach the US mainland for it to be smuggling: "If they're not capable of getting here, they cannot be smuggling."
Back to top	IP Logged

Serowbot

YaBB Moderator
ModSquad

Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 29677
Tucson Az
Gender: male

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #71 - 12/08/25 at 13:05:49

Maybe rather than blowing them up, we should be capturing them and inspecting their haul, and trying them if they are criminal.
Then we would know
That's how the Coast Guard has done it ... forever

We are committing war crimes, or worse... murder
This is a desperate attempt to distract from the Epstein files
and it's working

Who started this thread anyway?
Oh,... Springy, our number one MAGA nut
Way to think for yourself Springy
Trump points the finger and away you go like a bird dog Huh

Back to top

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh

...

IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 9913	Re: War on Drugs Reply #72 - 12/08/25 at 13:59:17 Maybe rather than blowing them up, we should be capturing them and inspecting their haul, and trying them if they are criminal. Then we would know That's how the Coast Guard has done it ... forever Along the US coast. If we do it this way, and there's fish on those boats, we can't claim we are killing narco-terrorists.
Back to top	IP Logged

Needles Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1207 AR Gender:	Re: War on Drugs Reply #73 - 12/08/25 at 14:51:58 In other words, Trump is a war criminal, guilty of civil rights violations, and a murderer, in addition to being a 34 time felon. If you just said things clearly, your spiel would be more accurate.
Back to top	IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9913

Re: War on Drugs
Reply #74 - 12/08/25 at 15:06:50

In other words, Trump is a war criminal, guilty of civil rights violations, and a murderer, in addition to being a 34 time felon. If you just said things clearly, your spiel would be more accurate.

I never said that. I said the argument that those boats don't have enough fuel to make it to the US is not a valid point. You want to argue about that very clear statement.

Back to top

IP Logged